Re: [jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools 3.3.0.M5 bits available for QE testing

> No, introducing a new upstream dep to the Core aggregator or having the > Core site be a composite instead of an aggregate would be not be simpler > / less error-prone. > > What would be better, however, is if we could guarantee that both sites > were built from the same SVN version. Looking at using a new Jenkins > Trigger plugin for this. > why isn't the wtp one built from the same exact binaries instead of a rebuild!?! /max > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-10437 > > N > > On 12/12/2011 11:21 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>> >>>> Rob and Nick should be able to tell more about what this contains besides just a plain copy of what is published to 3.3.0.M5 ? >>>> Nick - any resin why the .webtools is not simply aggregated into / ? >>> >>> Well, it could be but it's a duplicate of content already in .core, so there'd be no point. >> >> If it is just an aggregated part of core then less things that could go wrong ;) >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen >> >> >> > > -- > Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat > Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio > http://nick.divbyzero.com > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > /max http://about.me/maxandersen