It is simply an aggregation of the prebuilt binaries, but if it spins at
noon and gets AS build #nnn and the aggregate started spinning at
11:30am and gets AS build #nnn-1, then they won't align.
So, in theory, yes, they'll have the same bits but it's possible to get
out of synch.
On 12/12/2011 11:53 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> No, introducing a new upstream dep to the Core aggregator or having the
> Core site be a composite instead of an aggregate would be not be simpler
> / less error-prone.
> What would be better, however, is if we could guarantee that both sites
> were built from the same SVN version. Looking at using a new Jenkins
> Trigger plugin for this.
why isn't the wtp one built from the same exact binaries instead of a rebuild!?!
> On 12/12/2011 11:21 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>> Rob and Nick should be able to tell more about what this contains besides
just a plain copy of what is published to 3.3.0.M5 ?
>>>> Nick - any resin why the .webtools is not simply aggregated into / ?
>>> Well, it could be but it's a duplicate of content already in .core, so
there'd be no point.
>> If it is just an aggregated part of core then less things that could go wrong ;)
> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio