> How long time would it take to add code completion support for RF
If we want to have RF 3.1.x by default (if we can't recognize the
version of lib) then there will be a problem.
But isn't the schemas distinct enough to always recognize the correct version ?
Note: if we can't recognize the version i'm probably fine by falling back to 3.2
btw. why is hard to set a specific version as the default ? Is it hardcoded to take the
latest version as default or ?
Richaces TLD version tag has not been updated since 1.2.
So we are not able to tell one from the other.
Are you telling me the richfaces team does not update their TLD's ?
I thought the CDK where supposed to make that "easy" ?
I've cc'ed in Sergey S. to get his opinion on how we should go about supporting
updates to richfaces if the libraries does not maintain their schema version id's..?
It would take about one day to provide code completion for RF 3.2
only default lib will work.