RichFaces 3.2.1 is expected at the middle of May.
cool - any chance you could let us know when you have a build with the updated TLD's
so we could start integrating ASAP ?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com>
To: "Sergey Smirnov" <sim(a)exadel.com>; "Alexey Kazakov"
Cc: <jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>; "Sergey Vasilyev"
<svasilyev(a)exadel.com>; "Nikolay Belaevski"
"Alexander Smirnov" <asmirnov(a)exadel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: Richfaces 3.2 ?
>> We have never been change this number inside tld. It was 1.2 from the
>> first version. Mainly, because it does not make any since for run-time.
> Any tools and introspection tool would like to have it ;)
>> store the true version in the manifest.mf located close to tlds files
>> the META-INF instead.
>> Actually, the standard limits the content of this tag. It must only
>> divided by up to 3 dots. So, we cannot put the exact version there like
>> 3.2.0.GA or 3.2.0.SP1
> Just having the 3.2.0 would be sufficient for us since what comes after
> the 4th dot should
> be irelevant.
>> So, starting with RichFaces 3.2.1, we will turn CDK generator to generate
>> three number divided by dots. It is not ideal, but close to.
> Its way better ;)
> When is 3.2.1 expected ?
>> In general, we can enhance CDK to generate not only TLD, but the
>> for code extended assist. In this way, JBDS just needs to take this
>> meta-file from the jar file instead of the place it takes now. It will
>> to migrate from version to version more smoothly and without extra work
>> the JBDS team.
> sounds like something we should investigate and do it in a way other lib's
> could use too.
> Kazakov - comments ?
>> I told with Alexey about this feature, but looks like this topic was just
>> forgotten between the other more actual themes on that moment.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "Alexey Kazakov" <akazakov(a)exadel.com>
>> Cc: <jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>; "Sergey Vasilyev"
>> <svasilyev(a)exadel.com>; "Sergey Smirnov" <sim(a)exadel.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 10:25 AM
>> Subject: Re: Richfaces 3.2 ?
>>>>> How long time would it take to add code completion support for RF
>>>> If we want to have RF 3.1.x by default (if we can't recognize the
>>>> version of lib) then there will be a problem.
>>> But isn't the schemas distinct enough to always recognize the correct
>>> version ?
>>> Note: if we can't recognize the version i'm probably fine by falling
>>> to 3.2 by default.
>>> btw. why is hard to set a specific version as the default ? Is it
>>> hardcoded to take the latest version as default or ?
>>>> Richaces TLD version tag has not been updated since 1.2.
>>>> So we are not able to tell one from the other.
>>> Are you telling me the richfaces team does not update their TLD's ?
>>> I thought the CDK where supposed to make that "easy" ?
>>> I've cc'ed in Sergey S. to get his opinion on how we should go about
>>> updates to richfaces if the libraries does not maintain their schema
>>> version id's..?
>>>> It would take about one day to provide code completion for RF 3.2 but
>>>> only default lib will work.