6:26 p.m.
Everyone,
Today, we build JBoss Tools w/ Maven 3 and Tycho 0.12.0 (0.10.0 in the
32x branch).
Soon, I'd like to move us to 0.13.0 [0].
Max has expressed concerns that building with 0.13 is slower than with
0.12, but looking at some anecdotal evidence, I see that the change is
not significant:
Core:
#875, Sep 01, 3284 tests, 00 failures, 4hr01min, Tycho 0.12.0
#891, Sep 06, 3284 tests, 16 failures, 3hr43min, Tycho 0.13.0
#953, Sep 28, 3366 tests, 00 failures, 4hr24min, Tycho 0.13.0
SOA:
#60, Sep 04, 502 tests, 00 failures, 1hr18min, Tycho 0.12.0
#160, Oct 06, 511 tests, 00 failures, 1hr09min, Tycho 0.13.0
#164, Oct 07, 511 tests, 00 failures, 1hr34min, Tycho 0.13.0
This is a heads-up that the parent pom will be upversioned shortly from
0.0.2-SNAPSHOT to 0.0.3-SNAPSHOT (some time next week) to reflect this
change, and that all jobs in Hudson will begin running w/ 0.13.0 instead
of 0.12.0.
[0] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9140
--
I'm also going to be upversioning the parent pom so that anyone who
can't yet make the changes described here [1] regarding generation of
source plugins won't be impacted for M4. (That said I believe everyone's
already fixed their incomplete build.properties files.)
[1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8838
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
11:09 a.m.
Today, we build JBoss Tools w/ Maven 3 and Tycho 0.12.0 (0.10.0 in
the 32x branch).
Soon, I'd like to move us to 0.13.0 [0].
Just for trunk, right ? :)
Max has expressed concerns that building with 0.13 is slower than
with 0.12, but looking at some anecdotal evidence, I see that the change is not
significant:
Are these numbers with or without tests ?
The build speed Im concerned about is the "just build" part used to verify
compilation/packaging/dependency issues.
Core:
#875, Sep 01, 3284 tests, 00 failures, 4hr01min, Tycho 0.12.0
#891, Sep 06, 3284 tests, 16 failures, 3hr43min, Tycho 0.13.0
#953, Sep 28, 3366 tests, 00 failures, 4hr24min, Tycho 0.13.0
SOA:
#60, Sep 04, 502 tests, 00 failures, 1hr18min, Tycho 0.12.0
#160, Oct 06, 511 tests, 00 failures, 1hr09min, Tycho 0.13.0
#164, Oct 07, 511 tests, 00 failures, 1hr34min, Tycho 0.13.0
This is a heads-up that the parent pom will be upversioned shortly from 0.0.2-SNAPSHOT to
0.0.3-SNAPSHOT (some time next week) to reflect this change, and that all jobs in Hudson
will begin running w/ 0.13.0 instead of 0.12.0.
Thanks for the headsup - and just to be sure i'm in sync - its just in trunk, right ?
:)
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
6:30 p.m.
Yes, just trunk. Until we branch for M4, whereupon it'll be in trunk AND
the M4 branches.
But NOT the 32x/4x branches, just the ongoing development stream.
On 10/10/2011 05:09 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Today, we build JBoss Tools w/ Maven 3 and Tycho 0.12.0 (0.10.0
in the 32x branch).
>
> Soon, I'd like to move us to 0.13.0 [0].
Just for trunk, right ? :)
> Max has expressed concerns that building with 0.13 is slower than with 0.12, but
looking at some anecdotal evidence, I see that the change is not significant:
Are these numbers with or without tests ?
The build speed Im concerned about is the "just build" part used to verify
compilation/packaging/dependency issues.
> Core:
> #875, Sep 01, 3284 tests, 00 failures, 4hr01min, Tycho 0.12.0
> #891, Sep 06, 3284 tests, 16 failures, 3hr43min, Tycho 0.13.0
> #953, Sep 28, 3366 tests, 00 failures, 4hr24min, Tycho 0.13.0
>
> SOA:
> #60, Sep 04, 502 tests, 00 failures, 1hr18min, Tycho 0.12.0
> #160, Oct 06, 511 tests, 00 failures, 1hr09min, Tycho 0.13.0
> #164, Oct 07, 511 tests, 00 failures, 1hr34min, Tycho 0.13.0
>
> This is a heads-up that the parent pom will be upversioned shortly from
0.0.2-SNAPSHOT to 0.0.3-SNAPSHOT (some time next week) to reflect this change, and that
all jobs in Hudson will begin running w/ 0.13.0 instead of 0.12.0.
Thanks for the headsup - and just to be sure i'm in sync - its just in trunk, right ?
:)
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
6:18 p.m.
As there have been no objections since my warning email on Oct 7, the
JBT parent pom is now at version 0.0.3-SNAPSHOT, and it, along with our
Hudson jobs, defaults to use tychoVersion = 0.13.0
(https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9140).
I've updated all the poms I could find in JBT and JBDS repos, but have
not touched any other projects (Teiid, Savara, Drools, etc.) as I expect
those projects' leads will do so.
If you need a hand updating your poms to ref the new version, let me
know and I'll be happy to help.
If you regularly build your component(s) offline for testing before
committing (and everyone is doing that with either commandline mvn3 or
with m2eclipse... right?) be sure to pull down the updated parent pom
from SVN and build it so that the updated project root poms will be able
to find the correct version. The first time you build w/ thenew pom,
Maven will "download the internet" as it fetches the 0.13.0 version of
its plugins. After that, things should be back to normal.
---
Coming up in the next few days: more source features
(https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8838)!
Cheers,
Nick
On 10/10/2011 05:09 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Today, we build JBoss Tools w/ Maven 3 and Tycho 0.12.0 (0.10.0
in the 32x branch).
>
> Soon, I'd like to move us to 0.13.0 [0].
Just for trunk, right ? :)
> Max has expressed concerns that building with 0.13 is slower than with 0.12, but
looking at some anecdotal evidence, I see that the change is not significant:
Are these numbers with or without tests ?
The build speed Im concerned about is the "just build" part used to verify
compilation/packaging/dependency issues.
> Core:
> #875, Sep 01, 3284 tests, 00 failures, 4hr01min, Tycho 0.12.0
> #891, Sep 06, 3284 tests, 16 failures, 3hr43min, Tycho 0.13.0
> #953, Sep 28, 3366 tests, 00 failures, 4hr24min, Tycho 0.13.0
>
> SOA:
> #60, Sep 04, 502 tests, 00 failures, 1hr18min, Tycho 0.12.0
> #160, Oct 06, 511 tests, 00 failures, 1hr09min, Tycho 0.13.0
> #164, Oct 07, 511 tests, 00 failures, 1hr34min, Tycho 0.13.0
>
> This is a heads-up that the parent pom will be upversioned shortly from
0.0.2-SNAPSHOT to 0.0.3-SNAPSHOT (some time next week) to reflect this change, and that
all jobs in Hudson will begin running w/ 0.13.0 instead of 0.12.0.
Thanks for the headsup - and just to be sure i'm in sync - its just in trunk, right ?
:)
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
7:15 p.m.
Did you use http://mojo.codehaus.org/versions-maven-plugin/update-parent-mojo.html to do
the update ? or raw sed/awk ? :)
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
11:04 p.m.
sed? awk? Hardly. I used eclipse and vim. That way I could verify every
change. Turns out there's a lot of poms versioned 0.0.2-SNAPSHOT in JBDS
which did not require upversioning.
Nick
On 10/12/2011 01:15 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
Did you use http://mojo.codehaus.org/versions-maven-plugin/update-parent-mojo.html to do
the update ? or raw sed/awk ? :)
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
3 p.m.
On Oct 12, 2011, at 23:04, Nick Boldt wrote:
sed? awk? Hardly. I used eclipse and vim. That way I could verify
every change. Turns out there's a lot of poms versioned 0.0.2-SNAPSHOT in JBDS which
did not require up versioning.
eh - such as ?!
Only parent pom's should be on that by now.
/max
Nick
On 10/12/2011 01:15 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
> Did you use http://mojo.codehaus.org/versions-maven-plugin/update-parent-mojo.html to
do the update ? or raw sed/awk ? :)
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
>
>
>
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
5:02 p.m.
product/pom.xml, product/plugins/pom.xml, product/features/pom.xml, ...
all those need a version too, and it's generally 0.0.2-SNAPSHOT rather
than something more useful like 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT. Doesn't matter really
because it's just a version of a pom (packaging type = pom), not an osgi
object (feature or plugin).
On 10/13/2011 09:00 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
On Oct 12, 2011, at 23:04, Nick Boldt wrote:
> sed? awk? Hardly. I used eclipse and vim. That way I could verify every change. Turns
out there's a lot of poms versioned 0.0.2-SNAPSHOT in JBDS which did not require up
versioning.
eh - such as ?!
Only parent pom's should be on that by now.
/max
>
> Nick
>
> On 10/12/2011 01:15 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>
>> Did you use
http://mojo.codehaus.org/versions-maven-plugin/update-parent-mojo.html to do the update ?
or raw sed/awk ? :)
>>
>> /max
>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
> http://nick.divbyzero.com
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
6:15 p.m.
product/pom.xml, product/plugins/pom.xml, product/features/pom.xml,
... all those need a version too, and it's generally 0.0.2-SNAPSHOT rather than
something more useful like 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT. Doesn't matter really because it's just
a version of a pom (packaging type = pom), not an osgi object (feature or plugin).
sure it is - we changed this for jbosstools for consistency and simplification.
I'll put that on my todo…
/max
On 10/13/2011 09:00 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
> On Oct 12, 2011, at 23:04, Nick Boldt wrote:
>
>> sed? awk? Hardly. I used eclipse and vim. That way I could verify every change.
Turns out there's a lot of poms versioned 0.0.2-SNAPSHOT in JBDS which did not require
up versioning.
>
> eh - such as ?!
>
> Only parent pom's should be on that by now.
>
> /max
>
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> On 10/12/2011 01:15 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>
>>> Did you use
http://mojo.codehaus.org/versions-maven-plugin/update-parent-mojo.html to do the update ?
or raw sed/awk ? :)
>>>
>>> /max
>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
>
>
>
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
4578
days inactive
4584
days old
jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org
8 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Max Rydahl Andersen -
Nick Boldt