On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:19:22 +0200, Galder Zamarreno <galder.zamarreno(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
True, but why did you call it GA instead of CR2?
Because we thought it would be GA, but then we found bugs that needed fixing.
/max
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> That is a *build* from internal servers - not publically released yet.
>
> /max
>
>> Hmmm, according to this you did:
>>
>>
http://reports.qa.atl.jboss.com/binaries/RHDS/release/
>>
>> [DIR] 1.1.0.Beta1/ 16-Apr-2008 14:18 -
>> [DIR] 1.1.0.CR1/ 06-May-2008 03:29 -
>> [DIR] 1.1.0.GA/ 04-Jun-2008 15:18 -
>> [ ] jbdevstudio-1.1.0.CR1-source.tar.gz 08-May-2008 12:33 147M
>> [ ] jbdevstudio-1.1.0.GA.tar.gz 09-Jun-2008 23:16 148M
>>
>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>> Re:
>>>>
http://reports.qa.atl.jboss.com/binaries/RHDS/nightly/200806160051-nightly/
>>>>
>>>> You probably wanna be changing the version number of jbdevstudio
>>>> installers to something other than 1.1.0.CR1, correct? You released
>>>> 1.1.0.GA of it earlier this month :)
>>> No we didn't :)
>>>
>>> /max
>
>
>
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
http://www.opera.com/mail/