November 2008 - jbpm-dev - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Register EventListener on JbppmContext

by camunda

@Thomas: I also the events I want to listen for are more inside of the engine (so implementation detail ;-)). But the Listeners you propose also make sense, even if I don't understand the API at this part yet... @Tom: I expected you to say that ;-) And I agree with you, but for me the situation is not putting effort in jbpm 3 or 4, but to solve the problem in the customer project either by some workarounds around jbpm (in "our" code) or to implement it correctly in the jbpm 3 core. Effort could be maybe the same. So I think it makes more sense to contribute it to jbpm and maybe even gather experiences for jbpm 4. And even jbpm 3 will be around for quite a while I think... So if you don't vote explicitly against it I would maybe contribute it if it comes to that point in the current project (concept isn't yet fixed), ok? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190987#4190987 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190987

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Register EventListener on JbppmContext

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"camunda" wrote : Hi. | | Yesterday I was at customer and they did an extension to jbpm where they added the possibility to add EventListener to the JbpmContext (configured via jbpm.cfg.xml). | | Today I face a similar problem, it would be interesting to get notified if each event fired inside the engine (basically to catch them and maybe throw the aggregated to some BAM engine). | | What do you guys think, include such a feature in jbpm core? I think it is an interesting one without bit complexity. Also the guys from yesterday could provide some code for it (Tom, I heard there is a pending committer status request from them), so maybe it wouldn't be that hard... | | Opinions? | | Cheers | Bernd all our jbpm 3 efforts are now focussed on increasing the stability and test coverage (mainly dbs). this feature should be discussed in terms of jbpm4. in that context, it might be an option to leverage the environment for that. after a event propagated all the way up to the environment, it could be propagated further on the environment contexts. good idea, but needs some more reflection. performance might become an issue so it should be possible somehow to configure which events are propagated to the environment like that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190971#4190971 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190971

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: API first cut available for jBPM3

by kukeltje

I'm with Koen, Bernd, Heiko and Tom ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190959#4190959 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190959

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Register EventListener on JbppmContext

by kukeltje

@Bernd: Yes would be great. Compare this solution to adding actions to each node (or generic events in the processdefinition) that is e.g. needed for SeeWhy. @Thomas: I think messages and signals are not necessarily the same as what Bernd proposes. Messages and Signals from BPMN are Business level things, where as what Bernd proposes is more like an extension to the engine itself to make it even more flexible. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190957#4190957 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190957

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

limited connectivity tomorrow

by Tom Baeyens

Tomorrow, me and Koen will be travelling on the train to talk to the JWT people. So we will not be a lot on-line, if at all. -- regards, tom.

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Register EventListener on JbppmContext

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

This has been taken out of the 1-Jan cut of the API because we did not get to the general notion of Signals + Messages. Nevertheless, I also think this is a valid concept. Here are the API drafts for it SignalService http://www.jboss.org/community/docs/DOC-12891 MessageService http://www.jboss.org/community/docs/DOC-12889 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190903#4190903 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190903

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Register EventListener on JbppmContext

by camunda

Currently I am waiting for some feedback before committing, but the longer I think about it, the more valuable the feature looks to me... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190898#4190898 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190898

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Register EventListener on JbppmContext

by salaboy21

Great, let me know if you upload some code to the repository to check it out! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190859#4190859 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190859

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Register EventListener on JbppmContext

by camunda

Hi. Yesterday I was at customer and they did an extension to jbpm where they added the possibility to add EventListener to the JbpmContext (configured via jbpm.cfg.xml). Today I face a similar problem, it would be interesting to get notified if each event fired inside the engine (basically to catch them and maybe throw the aggregated to some BAM engine). What do you guys think, include such a feature in jbpm core? I think it is an interesting one without bit complexity. Also the guys from yesterday could provide some code for it (Tom, I heard there is a pending committer status request from them), so maybe it wouldn't be that hard... Opinions? Cheers Bernd View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190852#4190852 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190852

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: API first cut available for jBPM3

by salaboy21

I like Process and ProcessDefinition because I think that the only distintion to be made is the formal part of the process (ProcessDefinition) the other is always about the execution. Also I see in the examples that there will be some method called createProcessDefinition(XML), i think is better keep the old parseProcessDefinition in this case is more clear to me that i use the APIs. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190847#4190847 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190847

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-dev November 2008