June 2008 - jbpm-dev - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jbpm-api first draft

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

This seems a bit long winded | // Locate the ProcessEngine | ProcessEngine engine = ProcessEngineLocator.locateProcessEngine(); | | // Create a ProcessDefinition through the ProcessDefinitionManager | ProcessDefinitionManager pdm = engine.getProcessDefinitionManager(); | ProcessDefinition pd = pdm.createProcessDefinition(jpdl); | | // Create a ProcessInstance through the ProcessInstanceManager | ProcessInstanceManager pim = engine.getProcessInstanceManager(); | ProcessInstance pi = pim.createProcessInstance(pd); | | // Create an Execution through the ExecutionManager | ExecutionManager pem = engine.getExecutionManager(); | Execution ex = pem.createExecution(pi); | and could probably be done much shorter - like this | // Create a ProcessDefinition through the ProcessDefinitionManager | ProcessDefinitionManager pdm = ProcessDefinitionManager.locateProcessDefinitionManager(); | ProcessDefinition pd = pdm.createProcessDefinition(jpdl); | | // Create an Execution through the ProcessDefinition | Execution ex = pd.createExecution(pi); | Note however, that this would only introduce convenience access and not change the first approach conceptually. The API is designed such that objects can be navigated bi-directional. In other words, the ProcessDefinition can get the ProcessInstanceManager and the ExecutionManager and invoke createExecution that way. I'd like to introduce convenience short cuts when it becomes clear what the most frequent use cases are. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159442#4159442 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159442

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

jBPM SVN post-commit hook failure

by Thomas Diesler

Folks, please have a look at this failure [tdiesler@tdvaio jpdl-3.2.2]$ svn commit -m "WIP" Sending jpdl-3.2.2/README-COMMITERS.TXT Transmitting file data . Committed revision 1228. Warning: 'post-commit' hook failed with error output: /services/svn/repos/jbpm/hooks/post-commit: line 54: -r: command not found /services/svn/repos/jbpm/hooks/post-commit: line 56: -r: command not found -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler Web Service Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

16 years, 5 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Please subscribe to jbpm-dev@lists.jboss.org

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev cheers View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159438#4159438 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159438

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: http://jbpm.dyndns.org/jbpmwiki

by Thomas Diesler

merci Heiko Braun wrote: > > Siehe $Subject > -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler Web Service Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jbpm-api first draft

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Hi Ronald, conceptually, yes. On our way to jBPM4 we promise backward compatibility of API and process descriptors. Necessary changes in configuration will be documented. Database structure and content may change in an incompatible way. If you care, please add subtasks to JBPM-1250 that addresses functionality you would like to see covered through the API. Ideally, with a pointer to an equivalent test case in the jBPM3 code base. Our goal is that user code will only ever have to work with the API and does not have direct dependencies on either the jBPM3 nor jBPM4 code base cheers -thomas View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159437#4159437 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159437

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jbpm-api first draft

by kukeltje

Thomas, I assume (without checking first, I know) this is the 'backport' of the public api that will be in PVM? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159364#4159364 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159364

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - jbpm-api first draft

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, The first draft of the API is available here http://jbws.dyndns.org/jbpm-site/jbpm-api/apidocs/index.html The associated test case is here http://fisheye.jboss.com/browse/JbpmSvn/tempranillo/jpdl/branches/tdiesle... I implemented a mapping to the current jBPM3 code base for this basic test. On purpose, the API leaves out everything that is not covered by this usecase. The issue that deals with API design is http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-1250 Please provide feedback. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159332#4159332 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159332

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jPDL 4 early feedback

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

Notice that there are some TODO's in the namespace overview page (at the bottom). Ideas on those todo's are also welcome. I might highlight those TODO's later here in the forum as separate posts. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159308#4159308 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159308

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - jPDL 4 early feedback

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

I have outlined the initial scope and schema for jPDL 4. http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/jpdl4/doc/xsd/ Early feedback is welcome. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4159307#4159307 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4159307

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - test message

by blake.bowers＠jboss.com

please disregard View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4158791#4158791 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4158791

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-dev June 2008