July 2008 - jbpm-dev - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM3 should release lock-step with jPDL4

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

At code freeze we branch to a QA branch - you can always commit to trunk, View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162227#4162227 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162227

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Wait States a conceptual question

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Thanks, that clarifies the current implementation and opens up a new discussion of how it should be - because I doubt that the pattern above is what it should be. more to come ... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162226#4162226 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162226

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Wait States a conceptual question

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

And thanks to Tom the 3 day training was reduced to a 15 min pitch ;-) Cheers, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162177#4162177 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162177

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Wait States a conceptual question

by kukeltje

anonymous wrote : You should attend a jBPM training, eh? ;-)) He did, in Dublin, but there was to much Guinness involved... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162168#4162168 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162168

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Wait States a conceptual question

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

Just as Bernd says, control is propagated in a chain of responsibility from node to transition to node until a node stops propagating. The latter node will be the wait state. The call stack is: node.execute() | ->node.leave(Transition) | ->transition.take() | ->node.enter() | ->node.execute() As a side note, in jBPM 3 this simple propagation model has indirect recursion and may result in a stack overflow if a wait state is not encountered soon enough. This has been addressed in PVM. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162160#4162160 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162160

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Wait States a conceptual question

by camunda

You should attend a jBPM training, eh? ;-)) A node is a wait state as soon the execution is not propagated (so if node.leave is NOT called inside of the execute method), like a "state" or "task-node" if it contain tasks... The node class propagates the token (if no action is attached), so it is NOT a wait state... Cheers Bernd View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162156#4162156 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162156

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Wait States a conceptual question

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, currently control is returned to the client when process reaches a wait state. But what makes a node a wait state? I assume control is not returned for every node. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162155#4162155 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162155

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Confused about infrastructure (SVN, Mailinglist, ...)

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

I'll take care of the website. Regards, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162133#4162133 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162133

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Confused about infrastructure (SVN, Mailinglist, ...)

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | some rumours about a really new wiki. | yep, that's supposed to be on the way. However will it really fit our needs? Who knows. Currently we take was has been proven successful for other projects. The foremost reason for the custom mediawiki is that we want to get rid of docbook references at all. It will all be compiled from the wiki, regardless if it's user or developer contribution to the docs. This leaves us with one source for documentation and eliminates the redundancy between docbook and wiki docs. And you know: The people only write documentation if it's easy todo so. That includes maintenance as well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162089#4162089 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162089

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Confused about infrastructure (SVN, Mailinglist, ...)

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | the inconsistency... | is just a temporal thing. It needs to start somwhere and incrementally move to the right direction. The WIKI will be tackled next. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162084#4162084 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162084

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-dev July 2008