September 2008 - jbpm-dev - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Major refactoring of the jbpm3 core test suite

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

can you explain how you make sure that each test starts from a clean DB ? i also played with the idea that each test should delete its own generated data explicitely. but that turned out to be very impractical and tedious. usually when you forget to delete a record (and this can be very unexpected) it is not a problem so you won't know at that time. then when after a while a test might be created or changed and that might lead to a clash. those are typically very hard to find. so far, clearing the whole db has proven to work well. but i'm open to hearing alternatives if you think they are better. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176548#4176548 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176548

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Major refactoring of the jbpm3 core test suite

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-1733 I the search for a solution to the "schemaCreate() on setUp()" it became apparent that dropping/creating the schema on setup for every test (i.e. 300 times) during the testrun is not a valid option. It is only slightly better, if not equally bad, to clear the schema on setup. This is because the code for clearing the schema currently does this is a very "unintelligent" way by dropping/recreating foreign key constraints before deleting table content in an arbitrary order. This approach is invalid because it requires the jbpmtest user to have alter table privileges and also executes a very large number of DLL statements. Rather the opposite should be tested, which is that an "ordinary" jbpm user does not have the privileges to alter jbpm tables. JUnit works on the premises that a test sets up its own fixture and tears it down after ward. Generally, it is incorrect to delegate the cleanup of test N to setup of test N+1. Only test N can know what records have been created and should be removed afterwards. I refactored the testsuite according to the above, with the result that neither createSchema() nor clearSchema() is called during setUp or tearDown. As a result, the execution time of mysql tests drops from 25min to 8min http://jbws.dyndns.org:8280/hudson/job/jBPM-Matrix/container=jboss422,dat... and the execution time of postgresql tests drops from 5h to 20min, which allows them to run at all. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176501#4176501 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176501

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

jbpm4/jpdl/trunk does not compile

by Thomas Diesler

FYI, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Compilation failure /home/tdiesler/svn/jbpm/jbpm4/jpdl/trunk/modules/core/src/test/java/org/jbpm/jpdl/controlflow/DecisionHandlerTest.java:[63,49] cannot find symbol symbol : method beginProcessInstance() location: interface org.jbpm.pvm.client.ClientProcessDefinition Is there a commit policy for this module (i.e. what is the minimus set of tests that must pass for a commit)? It seems that this is because jpdl & pvm are out of sync. That this does not happen in the future again, I believe we should go ahead with this Unifying jBPM project lifecycles http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=142208 I believe that waiting for a PVM release is actually not needed. cheers -thomas -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler BPM Product Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM maven group ids

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

We conclude this issue to use * org.jbpm.jbpm3 * org.jbpm.jbpm4 I've modified the groupid accordingly View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176494#4176494 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176494

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

docbook questions

by Tom Baeyens

Hi Steve, I've posted 2 docbook questions. Is that the right location to ask questions ? Could you help me my way ? https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/MPJDOCBOOK-15 https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/MPJDOCBOOK-16 -- regards, tom.

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Multiple 1PC resources in enterprise

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

on the migration to ejb3: i don't think that is appropriate on jBPM 3. we can consider this on jBPM 4. on the tx issue: i didn't quite get it yet. i would guess the whole purpose of an appserver is to take care of making a global transaction out of XA transactional resources, no ? even if we would use different DSs. on java 1.4: i think we can drop 1.4 in 3.3.0 since we increased the minor version number View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176434#4176434 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176434

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - The PostgreSQL Issue

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Multiple 1PC resources in enterprise

by kukeltje

Hahaha... it can indeed be that simple but...In the anouncement when 3.3 comes out, I'd put a little more focus on this.... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176240#4176240 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176240

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM maven group ids

by kukeltje

"tom.baeyens(a)jboss.com" wrote : "koen" wrote : we could also do org.jbpm.3 and org.jbpm.4 Yuck.... -1 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176239#4176239 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176239

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Multiple 1PC resources in enterprise

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : Another option is to enable multiple last resource enlistment in the transaction service. This is in fact not an option ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176190#4176190 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176190

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-dev September 2008