September 2008 - jbpm-dev - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM maven group ids

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

If you look at http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/jbpm/ it is already difficult to see which artefacts belong to jbpm3 vs. jbpm4 Using the 3 and 4 in the groupid could make it easier for people browsing the repo online. But, yes it is not in line with the maven versioning philosophy, I am also happy to have a single groupid for both 3 and 4 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175854#4175854 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175854

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Multiple 1PC resources in enterprise

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

I added a comment on jdks and jbpm-3.2.3 to the wiki. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175847#4175847 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175847

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Multiple 1PC resources in enterprise

by kukeltje

Yes, I know the list, but that does not say anything about the jdk does it? 4.2.2 runs with 1.4 afaik, but for ejb3 you need at least 1.5. So either the list should be extended with a jdk version or restrictions should be applied. Maybe there should be a link on this wiki as well to the pre 3.3 releases and know-to-be-running containers. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175840#4175840 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175840

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM maven group ids

by kukeltje

why the 3 and 4 in the id? isn't that what the version number should contain? org.jboss.jbpm would be sufficient I guess. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175838#4175838 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175838

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: PostgeSQL runs take too long

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

the first place to look for the cause is the db-recreation inbetween all tests. at one time, to clean the db inbetween the tests, the key constraints were dropped and then a "delete from tablename" for all tables was done. this might have changed to a create-drop of the full schema. that is what should be checked first. recreation can be very costly. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175827#4175827 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175827

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM maven group ids

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

It is a good time to decide on the group id now, because neither jbpm3.3.x nor jbpm-4.0.x have been released to http://repository.jboss.com/maven2 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175810#4175810 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175810

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - jBPM maven group ids

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, there is confusion about jBPM maven group id's. We have "pre maven" imports of already released artefacts with group id org.jbpm http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/org/jbpm/ The current jBPM3 and jBPM4 code base, both use org.jboss.jbpm http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/jbpm which is in line with most other jboss projects http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/org/jboss/ I suggest for clarity reasons to use * org.jboss.jbpm3 * org.jboss.jbpm4 respectively View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175807#4175807 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175807

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Multiple 1PC resources in enterprise

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

The jBPM target containers are documented here http://jbpm.dyndns.org/jbpmwiki/index.php?title=JBPM3SupportedTargetConta... for jbpm-3.3.0 we don't target any other containers than these. What you say about EJB3 is certainly also true, likely even more so, for CMP. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175804#4175804 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175804

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - PostgeSQL runs take too long

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-1718 FYI, the core tests on postgesql take unexpectedly long. If you look at he Hudson console output, some tests take minutes to complete. The whole run takes over 2h. http://jbws.dyndns.org:8280/hudson/job/jBPM-Database-Matrix/container=jbo... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175803#4175803 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175803

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Multiple 1PC resources in enterprise

by kukeltje

Not all containers support EJB3, and it is, or at least was, the intention to be able to run in multiple containers. Same reason JDK1.4 is (was?) still the default target jdk. Maybe an additional profile can be made with an EJB3 config so people can choose View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4175790#4175790 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4175790

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-dev September 2008