August 2009 - jbpm-dev - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [BPMN2] Resource assignment

by kukeltje

And 'java serviceTask', send/receive message (e.g. to jms, folder etc... Very oriented towards esb stuff. Maybe we should join forces with those guys. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248367#4248367 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248367

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [BPMN2] Resource assignment

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

One can already feel that this will be an area where "BPMN compliant" implementations will be highly incompatible :-) Regards, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248362#4248362 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248362

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: interested in contributing ?

by kukeltje

This is indeed the most important part of the agreement and correct afair View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248360#4248360 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248360

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [BPMN2] Resource assignment

by kukeltje

Yep, thought of that to, you guys beat me. I'll make JUEL functions and just leverage that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248358#4248358 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248358

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: interested in contributing ?

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

Caleb, Let me explain you my limited knowledge of this agreement. It means that there is a shared copyright for the contributed code. Red Hat wants to have the ability to do stuff with the contributed code (such as for instance change the license to GPL or APL) without having to ask the formal agreement from each contributor. If this contributor agreement would not be there and if you (or your company) would not agree to e.g. change the license to APL than this would not be possible with LGPL. Btw, you yourself still have the right to distribute your contributed code under another (whether commercial or open source) license than LGPL. I hope this helps (and that it's somewhat correct ;-) ) Cheers, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248352#4248352 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248352

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [BPMN2] Resource assignment

by camunda

Good point: Why not make it part OF the expression (for now)? Bruce doesn't have anything about it in his book... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248346#4248346 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248346

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [BPMN2] Resource assignment

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

"Ronald" wrote : I kind of like Tom's idea of the language type. Maybe I can even leverage the existing jbpm 3 assignment expression. It doesn't feel very natural to me to define a separate language to resolve between groups and users. Using a jBPM 3 like assignment expression language probably makes sense though. Regards, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248341#4248341 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248341

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [BPMN2] advanced pvm/parsing question

by kukeltje

[quote[Couldn't you just remember them in the parser as a list? Maybe you don't need them after parsing any more if everything is configured? /quote] I already did that and it works anonymous wrote : Otherwise, maybe the ProcessDefinition has place for this kind of thing? It has, you implemented it ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248318#4248318 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248318

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [BPMN2] Resource assignment

by kukeltje

I kind of like Tom's idea of the language type. Maybe I can even leverage the existing jbpm 3 assignment expression. I'll focus on that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248314#4248314 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248314

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [BPMN2] Resource assignment

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

<resource id="regionalManager" name="Regional Manager"> | <resourceParameter id="buyerName" isRequired="true" name="Buyer Name" | type="xsd:string"/> | <resourceParameter id="region" isRequired="false" name="Region" | type="xsd:string"/> | <resourceParameter id="type" isRequired="false" name="jBPM type" | type="xsd:string"/> | </resource> Bernd wrote : | I had something like this in mind first, but wonder if that is correct (since the regionalManager is maybe always a user)? | I nevertheless think that this is the way the spec wants us to do it. A resource only specifies a number of parameters that are used at runtime to resolve the actual potential owner. There is probably room to define shortcuts that make it less clumsy to work with the jBPM task management implementation, but I would not concentrate on that for now. Regards, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248308#4248308 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248308

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-dev August 2009