I will re read your emails no problem, you can take a look at the jbpm-console-ng repo
where some DTOs are defined and there are no problems with transactions in that
environment.
Sent from my iPhone
On 14 Sep 2012, at 07:00, Marco Rietveld <mrietvel(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Mauricio,
I think you might have either read the e-mails too quickly or otherwise not understood
them. If you get a chance, it would be great if you could go through them again.
Thanks,
Marco
13-09-12 22:36, Mauricio Salatino:
> For the remote services layers (the transports layers) DTOs can be added, there is
not need of more mechanisms for that. It sounds that you are trying to cover uses cases
that are not usually required, you want to keep inside a transaction an object that is
being sent through the wire. For those kind of scenarios you can use specifications like
WS-Transactions, but I don't believe that it worth it and we should not be focused on
that.
>
> The CDI/Weld module covers all the other cases and provides a rock solid programming
model that we should follow.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Marco Rietveld <mrietvel(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Mauricio,
>
> Unless you changed the API so that the DTO being used is not the same as the entity,
your rewrite with CDI/etc. has the same fundamental problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Marco
>
> 12-09-12 23:16, Salaboy:
>
> I'm on PTO now, but that's or of the reason why I choose to use cdi/weld/seam
to re write the ht module, the extended persistence context and the programming model push
you to avoid having those issues. As soon as I came back I will finish the spring
integration and I will try to deliver a feature complete alpha module.
> Cheers
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 12 Sep 2012, at 12:16, Maciej Swiderski <mswiders(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Marco, another way could be to ensure transaction is started when taskservicesession
is created and closed (committed/rolledback) when taskservicesession is disposed, I did
that for a fix on
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPM-3763 which is on postgresql and
worked fine. So that way we ensure that session.write is in transaction as well. Of course
not tested all possible cases but worked for main ones.
>
> Wdyt?
>
> Maciej
>
> On 12.09.2012 12:22, Marco Rietveld wrote:
> Hi Maciej and Mauricio,
>
> I'm struggling to find a good solution for a problem and was hoping to get your
advice about the following.
>
>
> The human-task service uses it's entities as DTO's, namely the Task
class/instances.
>
> However, we use Hibernate, which uses lazy-loading, which means that Hibernate
substitutes proxy instances in collections until the actual collection
elements are needed.
>
> With Hibernate 3, we miraculously were able to avoid any large problems. However,
testing with EAP 6 has uncovered situations, primarily with postgresql, in which this
strategy (entity as DTO) just won't work.
>
> The problem is that even if all the "persistence" work is done in one tx,
the collections are still lazily-loaded. That means if a task service operation has to
return a Task instance, that the serialization of the Task object (when it's being
sent) triggers the loading of entities. Due to postgresql's Large Object facility,
this means that there needs to be a transaction around this action.
Because we don't surround the session.write(resultsCmnd); operation with a tx, we get
an exception.
>
> (To tell the truth, I don't understand why this worked with Hibernate 3.. )
>
> As I've been writing this, I've come up with a couple of solutions:
>
> 1. Turn off lazy-loading for all entities.
> 2. Force the loading of all relevant entities by going through the object tree
(task.getPeopleAssignments().size(), etc.. )
> 3. Put a transaction around session.write(resultsCmnd);
>
> Option 1 has a big impact on performance, especially if we start talking about
high-volumes.
> Option 2 has a slightly larger impact on performance but Option 3 seems a little bit
ugly to me.
>
>
> Are there any options I missed? Any advice or comments?
>
> Thanks,
> Marco
>
> PS. This is (IMHO) one of the reasons we need to rewrite human-task. I've been
working on a proposal/POC, but the important thing is that certain problems that we have
now aren't also present in the rewritten version.
>
>
>
> --
> jBPM/Drools developer
> Utrecht, the Netherlands
>
>
>
>
> --
> - MyJourney @
http://salaboy.wordpress.com
> - Co-Founder @
http://www.jugargentina.org
> - Co-Founder @
http://www.jbug.com.ar
>
> - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
>
--
jBPM/Drools developer
Utrecht, the Netherlands