Mauricio, these posts are really good. I like that they are kind of
series that provides more and more details and advanced usage scenarios
and what's in my opinion most important real life examples. Great work!
Any idea on how many posts you are going to provide? Was wondering that
it looks like nice content to be introduced into documentation as well.
Maybe not whole posts but sort of essence of it, as users especially new
comers will look into documentation first and could not be aware of our
blogs, wdyt?
So far you have not introduced the main (in my opinion) integration
between process and rule - business rule task, but that is probably
scheduled for next posts... However introduction of using work item
handlers here is more than needed. That gives opportunity to users to
get a chance to get familiar with work item handlers concept.
In the third one - great stuff is about reactive modes - both based on
fireUntilHalt and event listeners and some pros and cons of each
solution. Have not tried the examples myself but what could really rock
is an runnable example for each post to conclude it.
P.S.
While reading I spotted few minor things:
- on first post last two process diagrams (illustrations) shows
inclusive gateway but both text and annotations on its sequence flows
refer to/suggest exclusive gateway
- on third post I think you meant beforeProcessStarted method of process
event listener instead of afterProcessStarted as when this method is
called process is already finished or reached first state node which
could be after some rules evaluation nodes, isn't it?
Maciej
On 29.07.2012 14:14, Mauricio Salatino wrote:
Hi guys,
I've post a new article about the process and rules integrations.
I'm extremely open to discuss if this is the right way of exposing
this topics. I've found that when people doesn't understand this
topics they end up with very complicated architectural problems.
The main idea behind these posts is to clarify from the functional
behavior what kind of things can be done, in order to:
1) Gather feedback about new features that can be introduced to
facilitate the adoption of certain patterns
2) Classify in different patterns the functional requirements to then
explain which architecture fits better, or what kind of things the
users needs to be have in mind to define their own architecture.
http://blog.athico.com/2012/07/processes-rules-or-rules-processes-3x.html
After this post a set of patterns will be described and then a set of
architectural posts will go out. At this point feedback from the other
developers is crucial :)
Cheers
--
- MyJourney @
http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @
http://www.jugargentina.org
- Co-Founder @
http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
_______________________________________________
jbpm-dev mailing list
jbpm-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev