Re: [jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [859-MultiActionComponent] RESOLVED (was: Re: Composite components only support one action) attribute (review of issue 859)

MM> Hi guys, MM> targetAttributeName is problematic for me if we want to move to a MM> world "without" the target attribute. If we really want to allow MM> everything to work in this way, we need the implementation to pull the MM> method-expressions in - and not the interface to push them down. Yes, I understand. We're working towards that. But we're not going to be removing anything from the API. We'll just document that there is a better way to do it. MM> In such a world, the attribute name "targetAttributeName" is MM> meaningless, at least to my understanding. Your comments have been noted. Ed -- | edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017 | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/ | 8 work days until German Oracle User's Group Conference