I agree with Martin here, forcing Serializable on all DataModel implementations could have
some strange results in some cases.
Regards,
~ Simon
________________________________
From: JSR 314 Open Mailing list on behalf of Martin Marinschek
Sent: Tue 4/28/2009 1:41 AM
To: JSR-314-OPEN(a)JCP.ORG
Subject: Re: [jsr-314-open] adding the Serializable interface to DataModel
I don't think the DataModel interface itself should be serializable
(e.g. a ResultSetDataModel might not be serializable). But the
implementations should be by default.
regards,
Martin
On 4/27/09, Kito Mann <kito.mann(a)virtua.com> wrote:
+1 (I know it's past the stated deadline, but this should at
least be moved
to the 2.1 list)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it be possible to make DataModel serializable? Both Seam and Spring
> Faces have to override the built-in DataModel implementations just to add
> this interface, and it's really unnecessary.
>
>
>
http://docs.jboss.org/seam/2.1.1.GA/api/org/jboss/seam/jsf/ListDataModel....
>
>
http://static.springframework.org/spring-webflow/docs/2.0.x/javadoc-api/o...
>
> This seems like a pretty trivial change to make.
>
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>
>
http://mojavelinux.com <
http://mojavelinux.com/>
>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
>
> NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
> basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
> from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a
> week,
> it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
> caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if
> you feel that it did not reach my attention.
>
--
http://www.irian.at <
http://www.irian.at/>
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces