Re: [jsr-314-open] [ADMIN] JSF 2.0 Spec Snapshot
michael freedman wrote:
This version of the spec doesn't seem to include a number of
topics we
have been discussing the past few weeks, including page parameters and
Ajax changes (to better run in a portlet environment). When do you
expect a review draft that includes these more recent changes? For
the draft I have the following few comments:
1. Until I hear a yeah or nay I would like to continue to recommend
the changes I proposed making javax.faces.component.UIViewRoot a
NamingContainer that implements portlet namespacing when
run/accessed in portlet requests.
2. Section 14.1 (Ajax): its not clear whether any hidden fields
other than javax.faces.ViewState are included in ajax requests
by jsf.ajax.getViewState. The HTML successful controls doc says
they may be included but that seems too loose. Portlets need
some accommodation to support the following use case:
An Ajax using JSF portlet is included in an Ajax using JSF
consumer page by a consumer defined process that inlines the
portlet. By inlining I mean the consumer parses the portlet
markup, removes/rewrites the target of <form> elements as
hidden fields (to avoid the embeded form problem), and
namespaces all the form's fields so that when the consumers
page is submitted it can decode those fields pertaining to
this portlet. The outcome of this process is the hidden
field name = "javax.faces.ViewState" is rewriten as name =
"ns:javax.faces.ViewState". When the overall page is
submitted we need to ensure this hidden field is submitted
whenever any of the portlet's input fields would also be
submitted. One easy way to do this is to submit all the
hidden fields as part of the form state.
Note: if we make progress on the active discussion
regarding namespacing this field, the
I have updated both the jsdocs for jsf.getViewState and Section 14.1 of
the spec to clarify that all input elements of type "hidden" are included
in he collection and encoding process. The implementation was already
doing this.
1.
2. Section 14.2.3: typo -- the description references jsf.viewState
but it looks like it means to reference jsf.getViewState.
Fixed.
-Mike-
Roger Kitain wrote:
> I've uploaded a spec snapshot to
>
>
https://javaserverfaces-spec-eg.dev.java.net/files/documents/2091/127938/...
>
>
> Please review this in detail, because the next one is going out to
> JCP on March 6, 2009.
>
> Roger