[jsr-314-open] [468-relocationTarget] REQUIREMENT (was: Re: [jsf2.next] <h:head> vs. <head>)
>>>> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:37:03 -0500, Neil Griffin
<neil.griffin(a)portletfaces.org> said:
NG> Once again, I'm reviving an older thread. So glad to be able to post
NG> again! :-) When running in a portlet environment, it is forbidden
NG> for a JSF portlet to render tags like <head> and <body>. Tags like
NG> that are controlled by the portlet container, when aggregating
NG> portlet fragments into a complete HTML document.
NG> So I think it would be better to have the page author to explicitly
NG> specify h:head and h:body. If they specify plain old <head> and
NG> <body> then the portlet container will likely strip them
NG> out. Currently, we can override the renderers for h:head and h:body
NG> in a portlet bridge in order to have them not render those tags.
Spec issue 468 is this exactly. Because this is a request for a
component (actually a new renderer type, I think), I'd love to assign
issue 468 to someone on this list, get them to write the component, and
share it with the group.
Any takers?
Ed
--
| ed.burns(a)sun.com | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/