Re: [jsr-314-open] [jsf2.next] <h:head> vs. <head>
Sorry guys. Had limited connection to the world for the past few days :)
My droid doesn't like java.net issue tracker -- who wants to write an
app??? ;)
Thanks Roger!
---
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 09:25 -0700, David Geary wrote:
Thanks Roger!
david
2009/12/16 Roger Kitain <Roger.Kitain(a)sun.com>
I've filed this as "Implicit Resource Relocation":
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=702
-roger
David Geary wrote:
2009/12/15 Jim Driscoll <Jim.Driscoll(a)sun.com
<mailto:Jim.Driscoll@sun.com>>
Could someone please file this as a spec RFE?
Lincoln?!? You were the last to respond, buddy. :)
david
We'll have to do a performance test to really see
the
implications, but it does seem like it would be
useful to have this.
Jim
On 12/15/09 12:04 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
I'd even like to see it add <head> if not
provided. Would that
be too
overreaching?
Lincoln Baxter III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
Keep it simple.
On Dec 15, 2009 1:02 PM, "David Geary"
<clarity.training(a)gmail.com
<mailto:clarity.training@gmail.com>
<mailto:clarity.training@gmail.com
<mailto:clarity.training@gmail.com>>>
wrote:
2009/12/15 Lincoln Baxter, III
<lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com
<mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com>
<mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com
<mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com>>>
> > It would be nice if it "just worked",
and jsf would
automatically
add/detect he right place to l...
+1. I always pitch h:head and h:body as
necessary to
coordinate with
resource relocation from h:outputScript and
h:outputStylesheet, but it
would be great if you could just use <head>
and <body>
instead, and
have everything work.
david
> > Lincoln Baxter III > http://ocpsoft.com
>
http://scrumshark.com >
Keep it simple. >> >> On Dec 1...
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 6.0 KB)