+1 to both items.
On Aug 27, 2009, at 8:29 PM, Andy Schwartz wrote:
Dan Allen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Ed Burns <Ed.Burns(a)sun.com
<mailto:Ed.Burns@sun.com
> >> wrote:
>
> The class javax.faces.event.PostAddToViewNonPDLEvent should have
> been
> removed before the spec went final. There are no usages of this
> class
> anywhere in the RI, nor is it mentioned anywhere in the PDF
> document.
>
> I am asking your permission to remove it from the API.
>
>
> +1
+1
>
>
> Speak now or forever hold your peace!
>
>
> I'm thinking we should establish a voting policy when requests like
> this go out to the mailinglist. When a simple ya/nay inquiry is put
> forth, it needs let's say 4 EG votes to be considered accepted.
> Obviously, that would not be sufficient for big things, but use
> your best judgment on the classficiation. When 4 votes are
> received, just send a follow up message to say "accepted."
>
Seems reasonable for these sorts of relatively uncontroversial issues.
Andy
> Please correct my recommendation if you don't agree.
>
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
>
http://mojavelinux.com
>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
Jason Lee, SCJP
President, Oklahoma City Java Users Group
Senior Java Developer, Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.steeplesoft.com