In preparation for my JFokus talk I'm going through Peter Thomas's "jsf sucks" screed and tagging the referenced articles with delicious tags. My goal is to separate the wheat from the chaff. Here are the tags I've been using so far jsf-problem-reason-outdatad Some or all of the content in a URL with this tag is no longer relevant because subsequent releases of JSF have directly addressed the problem. jsf-problem-reason-polemical Some or all of the content in a URL with this tag is purely polemical, unsubstantiated, or otherwise not trustworthy. jsf-problem-reason-complexity Some or all of the content in a URL with this tag complains about the complexity of JSF but misses out on the design center of JSF providing flexibility. jsf-problem-reason-misunderstanding-persistence Some or all of the content in a URL with this tag stems from a misunderstanding of how JSF uses persistence or a database. jsf-problem-reason-misunderstanding-security Some or all of the content in a URL with this tag stems from a misunderstanding of how JSF provides security I've only made it to "Gradebook Taming JSF 1.1" in his thread. If you have some time to do some tagging, please have at it. Feel free to create new tags, but please follow the naming convention of starting your tag with jsf-problem-reason-* jsf-problem-reason-misunderstanding-* Once we develop a vocabulary of tags, I think we'll have a valuable resource, turning a negative into a positive. Thanks, Ed -- | ed.burns(a)sun.com | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640 | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/