[jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [ADMIN]Decision: Drop support for JavaSE 5 in ongoing Oracle Mojarra 2.1 development efforts
1:23 p.m.
http://twitter.com/edburns/status/21334998860
In order to bring the testing matrix for Mojarra more in line with
Oracle's current engineering investment, we are planning to have
all future Mojarra builds that are targeting the upcoming JSF 2.1
specification only support JavaSE 6 and beyond. Any 2.0.X and 1.2 builds
will still continue to be built with Java SE 5.
If you have any comments about this decision, please let me know here.
Ed
--
| edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
| 02 work days until JSF 2.1 Milestone 2
1:30 p.m.
Although I understand that Java SE 5 has reached end-of-life status, unless there are
features in Java SE 6 that are needed by Mojarra, my vote would be to compile with Java SE
5.
Believe it or not, there are Fortune 500 companies that are still version-locked on Java
1.4.
IMHO it would hinder adoption to require a Java 6 JRE for Mojarra 2.1.
On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Ed Burns wrote:
http://twitter.com/edburns/status/21334998860
In order to bring the testing matrix for Mojarra more in line with
Oracle's current engineering investment, we are planning to have
all future Mojarra builds that are targeting the upcoming JSF 2.1
specification only support JavaSE 6 and beyond. Any 2.0.X and 1.2 builds
will still continue to be built with Java SE 5.
If you have any comments about this decision, please let me know here.
Ed
--
| edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
| 02 work days until JSF 2.1 Milestone 2
10:17 p.m.
New subject: [jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [ADMIN]Decision: Drop support for JavaSE 5 in ongoing Oracle Mojarra 2.1 development efforts
Then presumably, those companies can't even use the current version of
Mojarra, so that is neither here nor there.
-- Blake Sullivan
On 8/16/10 11:30 AM, Neil Griffin wrote:
Although I understand that Java SE 5 has reached end-of-life status,
unless there are features in Java SE 6 that are needed by Mojarra, my
vote would be to compile with Java SE 5.
Believe it or not, there are Fortune 500 companies that are still
version-locked on Java 1.4.
IMHO it would hinder adoption to require a Java 6 JRE for Mojarra 2.1.
On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Ed Burns wrote:
> http://twitter.com/edburns/status/21334998860
>
> In order to bring the testing matrix for Mojarra more in line with
> Oracle's current engineering investment, we are planning to have
> all future Mojarra builds that are targeting the upcoming JSF 2.1
> specification only support JavaSE 6 and beyond. Any 2.0.X and 1.2 builds
> will still continue to be built with Java SE 5.
>
> If you have any comments about this decision, please let me know here.
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
> | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
> | 02 work days until JSF 2.1 Milestone 2
10:44 a.m.
New subject: [jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [ADMIN]Decision: Drop support for JavaSE 5 in ongoing Oracle Mojarra 2.1 development efforts
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Neil Griffin <neil.griffin(a)portletfaces.org
wrote:
Although I understand that Java SE 5 has reached end-of-life status,
unless
there are features in Java SE 6 that are needed by Mojarra, my vote would be
to compile with Java SE 5.
Believe it or not, there are Fortune 500 companies that are still
version-locked on Java 1.4.
IMHO it would hinder adoption to require a Java 6 JRE for Mojarra 2.1.
I would usually agree with this statement, but I think that any company
that's actually willing to use Mojarra 2.1 will have upgraded to Java EE 6.
My "conservative" clients are just upgrading to Java EE 5 and JSF 1.2, and
they're willing to use JDK 1.6.
On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Ed Burns wrote:
http://twitter.com/edburns/status/21334998860
In order to bring the testing matrix for Mojarra more in line with
Oracle's current engineering investment, we are planning to have
all future Mojarra builds that are targeting the upcoming JSF 2.1
specification only support JavaSE 6 and beyond. Any 2.0.X and 1.2 builds
will still continue to be built with Java SE 5.
If you have any comments about this decision, please let me know here.
Ed
--
| edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
| 02 work days until JSF 2.1 Milestone 2
8:21 p.m.
New subject: [jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [ADMIN]Decision: Drop support for JavaSE 5 in ongoing Oracle Mojarra 2.1 development efforts
Until Apache Harmony is safely at SE 6, I am rooting for SE 5 :-)
> On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Ed Burns wrote:
>
> http://twitter.com/edburns/status/21334998860
>
> In order to bring the testing matrix for Mojarra more in line with
> Oracle's current engineering investment, we are planning to have
> all future Mojarra builds that are targeting the upcoming JSF 2.1
> specification only support JavaSE 6 and beyond. Any 2.0.X and 1.2 builds
> will still continue to be built with Java SE 5.
>
> If you have any comments about this decision, please let me know here.
>
> Ed
5013
days inactive
5016
days old
jsr-314-open-mirror@lists.jboss.org
4 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Blake Sullivan -
Cay Horstmann -
Ed Burns -
Kito Mann -
Neil Griffin