The class javax.faces.event.PostAddToViewNonPDLEvent should have been removed before the spec went final. There are no usages of this class anywhere in the RI, nor is it mentioned anywhere in the PDF document. I am asking your permission to remove it from the API.

Speak now or forever hold your peace!

Dan Allen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Ed Burns <Ed.Burns(a)sun.com <mailto:Ed.Burns@sun.com > >> wrote: > > The class javax.faces.event.PostAddToViewNonPDLEvent should have > been > removed before the spec went final. There are no usages of this > class > anywhere in the RI, nor is it mentioned anywhere in the PDF > document. > > I am asking your permission to remove it from the API. > > > +1 +1 > > > Speak now or forever hold your peace! > > > I'm thinking we should establish a voting policy when requests like > this go out to the mailinglist. When a simple ya/nay inquiry is put > forth, it needs let's say 4 EG votes to be considered accepted. > Obviously, that would not be sufficient for big things, but use > your best judgment on the classficiation. When 4 votes are > received, just send a follow up message to say "accepted." > Seems reasonable for these sorts of relatively uncontroversial issues. Andy > Please correct my recommendation if you don't agree. > > -Dan > > -- > Dan Allen > Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action > Registered Linux User #231597 > > http://mojavelinux.com > http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan