>>>> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:38:17 -0400, Simon Lessard
<Simon_Lessard(a)DMR.CA> said:
SL> If you're doing this kind of refactoring, then I think you should
SL> move the new "vdl" package to javax.faces.vdl rather than
SL> javax.faces.webapp.vdl. It would be better that way since the vdl is
SL> not by definition linked to the message transport layer
SL> (webapp). For example, it would be theoretically possible to load a
SL> view without being in webapp (assuming the vdl doesn't requires
SL> accept to a ServletContext) then serve it to the client using
SL> whatnot technology (assuming that technology has a FacesServlet
SL> equivalent).
I prefer to think of it as renaming, not refactoring, but the IDE button
is the same :). Anyhow, I think javax.faces.view is better. I'll do
that.
--
| ed.burns(a)sun.com | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
| homepage: |
http://ridingthecrest.com/