[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Steven Hawkins commented on TEIID-5833:
---------------------------------------
[~blafond1] [~rareddy] any qualms with moving away from the notion of a uri for the fully
qualified name of an extension property? Seems like we can get just as much mileage out
of just the prefix concept.
Update extension metadata uri's
-------------------------------
Key: TEIID-5833
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5833
Project: Teiid
Issue Type: Quality Risk
Components: Query Engine
Reporter: Steven Hawkins
Assignee: Steven Hawkins
Priority: Major
Fix For: 13.0
There are a lot of long/old extension metadata uris - including the odata one which still
references teiid designer. We should see about making these simpler - perhaps even
dropping the notion of fqn vs prefix altogether so that we just deal with the raw
prefixes.
The only issue with changes is when the extension properties are left fully qualified in
the metadata. We'd need to lookup under both the old and new versions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)