[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Mark Addleman commented on TEIID-147: ------------------------------------- On the first option, I'd prefer a convention-based approach rather than annotations because annotation support in Clojure is still experimental. I don't know how well other languages support annotations. Spit-balling an idea: to better support dynamically compiled languages, clients could register one or more stored-proc factories. Each factory could return an array/iterable of stored procedures, each of which implemented some interface. It seems like these two options address two different use cases. The first option addresses stored procedures authored in a language-aware IDE. The second option seems like it is better suited to stored procedures are better authored in a text file. As I see it, the primary difference between the two is whether the IDE could understand the stored procedure as a language or simply as text. Of course, if the IDE understands the stored procedure as a real language, the programmer has access to all of the IDE niceties. My vote is for the first option. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.6#6264)