Re: [webbeans-dev] Is @Named qualifier?

From: Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt; Subject: Re: [webbeans-dev] Is @Named qualifier? To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; Cc: "Takeshi Kondo" <takeshi.kondo(a)gmail.com&gt;, webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 6:36 PM @Named is a qualifier in 330? That makes absolutely no sense. I think that linkage should be severed. - Dan Allen Sent from my Android-powered G1 phone: An open platform for carriers, developers and consumers. On Sep 4, 2009 8:09 AM, "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; wrote: Oh, we had exact the same discussion over at OpenWebBeans today. What about re-introducing @BindingType again but making it an @Qualifier? In fact, JSR-330 @Qualifier says nothing about type safety and resolution at all, so this is basically undefined afaik. So having a well defined @BindingType again would imho be a good thing. LieGrue, strub --- On Wed, 9/2/09, Takeshi Kondo <takeshi.kondo(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > From: Takeshi Kondo <takeshi.kondo(a)gmail.com&gt; > Subject: [webbeans-dev] Is @Named qualifier? > To: webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 8:45 PM > Hi > > I'm a bit confused about @Named annotation. > @Named is qualifier in jsr-330. However in w...