Re: [weld-dev] CDI JavaDoc

I'm trying to find time, but distracted by this IBM stuff. On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Yup, this is definitely something, now the spec is basically not going to > change again, it is worth putting a lot time into. > > Gavin, are you able to take a lead on this? > > On 19 Oct 2009, at 20:34, Gavin King wrote: > >> OK, folks we got one big, important job before the spec can go final. >> We need to re-do the JavaDoc for all the standard APIs. >> >> Each type needs a complete explanation (perhaps copy/paste from the >> spec). The important stuff (everything except for exceptions) needs >> examples. We need links between related types (things used together). >> We also need to fix all the errors that currently exist. >> >> I think it's very, very important that this stuff be extremely >> well-documented. For many developers, this javadoc will be their very >> first contact with JSR-299! >> >> -- >> Gavin King >> gavin.king(a)gmail.com >> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin >> http://hibernate.org >> http://seamframework.org >> _______________________________________________ >> weld-dev mailing list >> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > >