Mark,
Are you saying you might get a request scope Context via
contexts.getRequestionContext() even if the context is not active while the
BeanManager.getContext(RequestScoped.class) gives you a better exception
instead? The javadoc on BeanManger states that you should get a
ContextActiveException if the context is not active. Anyway, I think
BeanManager.getContext(RequestScoped.class) is widely used and it is an api.
Thanks
Emily
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de> wrote:
No it makes perfect sense in _some_ cases to use
Contexts.getRequestContxt() as BeanManager.getContext(RequestScoped.class)
might throw a ContextNotActiveException.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 07.05.2015 um 17:02 schrieb Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com>:
>
> Hi Emily,
>
> you can submit TCK challenges direcly by opening JIRA issues at
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK.
>
> As for this particular one I am not sure why the
Contexts.getRequestContext() method is still used in the tests.
BeanManager.getContext(RequestScoped.class) should IMHO be used instead.
>
> Jozef
>
> On 05/07/2015 01:50 PM, Emily Jiang wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to run cdi 1.2 tck:
>> In test:
org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.event.observer.conditional.ConditionalObserverTest
>> Method: testConditionalObserverMethodNotInvokedIfNoActiveContext
>>
>> I got this following failure:
>> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Singleton not set for STATIC_INSTANCE
=> [29478a84-0d13-49f5-b140-34a6cd92ab71,
0dd30cdc-10f4-4ec0-a8c5-d8fa3a82fc25, bbc59ac1-4747-49d0-96a3-12f0d4987829,
3459400f-dd41-473c-a4db-94d60fe5899b, 10795c17-3611-41d5-b7ca-497709c2ad53,
f10c929f-5314-44ba-aeb4-99888f6b4611, a22c5a8f-bf26-4f54-a847-d1c7b5532426,
00c3de8d-65d9-4ba7-804a-9c3c515e59d7, d7c8be7e-8b52-4c88-97e1-5ba6925fb794,
72ac8455-7c21-4090-b7ec-13d70c75a7d7, dbe7255d-5485-4c2a-b547-058815660144,
d3bb3d00-3214-48a5-b662-499010197e12]
>> at
org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.api.helpers.RegistrySingletonProvider$RegistrySingleton.get(RegistrySingletonProvider.java:28)
>> at org.jboss.weld.Container.instance(Container.java:55)
>> at
org.jboss.weld.tck.ContextsImpl.getRequestContext(ContextsImpl.java:33)
>> at
org.jboss.weld.tck.ContextsImpl.getRequestContext(ContextsImpl.java:30)
>> at
org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.event.observer.conditional.ConditionalObserverTest.testConditionalObserverMethodNotInvokedIfNoActiveContext(ConditionalObserverTest.java:96)
>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>
>> From the stack trace, two strange things are happening:
>>
>> 1) the TCK code is calling into org.jboss.weld.Container which is an
internal Weld class which should not be visible to application so the
application should not need to load them
>> 2) the TCK code is calling Container.instance() with no arguments,
which should not be called. We always use Container.instance(contextId), in
accordance with Weld doc A.3.2.4. Singleton SPI (this should be used in
OSGi environment).
>>
>> Can someone help to explain why the tck test was done this way? Is it
accurate?
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>> Emily
>> =================
>> Emily Jiang
>> ejiang(a)apache.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> weld-dev mailing list
>>
>> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev