WELD-862 and Seam Cron
by Peter Royle
Hi,
I'm aiming to make a release of Seam Cron available within the next two weeks. Currently there is an outstanding issue (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-862) which prevents Cron from running properly with Weld. I have been able to carry on developing Cron by testing it against OpenWebBeans, but obviously if we are to release a Seam module it should work against Weld.
It would be nice if WELD-862 could be fixed as soon a possible so that all future versions will work well with Cron.
But more importantly I also probably need to do something special in Cron so that it will work with the version of Weld already deployed in JBoss AS and Glassfish, which will contain the bug. The workaround mentioned in the bug report is to deep copy the InvocationContext. I attempted to do this by serialising and unserialising the InvocationContext but couldn't due to UnserializableExceptions. Does anyone have any advice for me about how I might be able to work around this bug to support existing versions of Weld?
Cheers,
Pete R
2 months
Re: [weld-dev] [cdi-dev] microbenchmark for CDI performance
by Jozef Hartinger
Btw I've run your benchmark locally and observed the following results:
OWB 1.2.6: 9827ms
Weld 2.2.5.Final: 20ms
;-)
I did however tweak the test a bit so that Weld's optimizations can be
leveraged[1]. I admit that in certain situations (like your test without
my change) Weld performs worse than it should and this is a good input
for us.
As for the NPE you observed not sure what is going on there. Perhaps
WeldContextControl implementation in DeltaSpike is not really thread safe?
Jozef
[1] https://github.com/jharting/cdi-performance/commits/weld
On 10/21/2014 01:43 PM, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> thanks for showcasting your new feature. Great to see OWB getting
> faster! As for the micro benchmark I suggest that you check out JMH[1].
>
> If you need an input from the Weld team, use weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/jmh/
>
> On 10/21/2014 11:59 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Weld folks, I need some help with a micro benchmark:
>>
>> You know we've talked about disk footprint in SE, so I hacked together a small microbenchmark and as a side effect we also got what is really needed to have CDI running
>>
>> https://github.com/struberg/cdi-performance
>>
>> I'm curious about missing some dependency excludes for Weld.
>>
>> could you please run
>>
>> $> mvn clean dependency:copy-dependencies -DincludeScope=compile -PWeld -Dweld.version=2.2.5.Final
>> $> ls -al target/dependency/
>>
>> and tell me which dependencies can be without having some CDI functionality missing?
>>
>> Feel free to pimp the pom and ship a pull request.
>>
>>
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
11 years, 3 months
Re: [weld-dev] [cdi-dev] microbenchmark for CDI performance
by Mark Struberg
I was under the impression that weld-dev just got renamed to cdi-dev.
I also got another issue while quickly starting up new threads:
88 [main] INFO org.jboss.weld.Bootstrap - WELD-000101 Transactional services not available. Injection of @Inject UserTransaction not available. Transactional observers will be invoked synchronously.
Exception in thread "Thread-3" java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.weld.ContextController.startRequestScope(ContextController.java:147)
at org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.weld.WeldContextControl.startRequestScope(WeldContextControl.java:161)
at org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.weld.WeldContextControl.startContext(WeldContextControl.java:70)
at at.struct.cdi.performance.CdiPerformanceTest$1.run(CdiPerformanceTest.java:56)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
is this a concurrency issue under high load? Or am I just doing something wrong?
LieGrue,
strub
On Tuesday, 21 October 2014, 12:49, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Mark,
>
>
>Did you mean to send this to weld-dev instead of cdi-dev? (though I'm not sure if that list is still maintained)
>
>
>At first glance, these look odd:
>
>
>persistence-api-1.0.2.jar
>validation-api-1.0.0.GA.jar
>jboss-ejb-api_3.1_spec-1.0.2.Final.jar
>jboss-el-api_3.0_spec-1.0.0.Alpha1.jar
>
>
>I don't recall them coming in when running SE.
>
>
>On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de> wrote:
>
>Hi!
>>
>>Weld folks, I need some help with a micro benchmark:
>>
>>You know we've talked about disk footprint in SE, so I hacked together a small microbenchmark and as a side effect we also got what is really needed to have CDI running
>>
>>https://github.com/struberg/cdi-performance
>>
>>I'm curious about missing some dependency excludes for Weld.
>>
>>could you please run
>>
>>$> mvn clean dependency:copy-dependencies -DincludeScope=compile -PWeld -Dweld.version=2.2.5.Final
>>$> ls -al target/dependency/
>>
>>and tell me which dependencies can be without having some CDI functionality missing?
>>
>>Feel free to pimp the pom and ship a pull request.
>>
>>
>>txs and LieGrue,
>>strub
>>_______________________________________________
>>cdi-dev mailing list
>>cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>>Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>
>
>
>
11 years, 5 months
