WELD-862 and Seam Cron
by Peter Royle
Hi,
I'm aiming to make a release of Seam Cron available within the next two weeks. Currently there is an outstanding issue (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-862) which prevents Cron from running properly with Weld. I have been able to carry on developing Cron by testing it against OpenWebBeans, but obviously if we are to release a Seam module it should work against Weld.
It would be nice if WELD-862 could be fixed as soon a possible so that all future versions will work well with Cron.
But more importantly I also probably need to do something special in Cron so that it will work with the version of Weld already deployed in JBoss AS and Glassfish, which will contain the bug. The workaround mentioned in the bug report is to deep copy the InvocationContext. I attempted to do this by serialising and unserialising the InvocationContext but couldn't due to UnserializableExceptions. Does anyone have any advice for me about how I might be able to work around this bug to support existing versions of Weld?
Cheers,
Pete R
2 months
Re: [weld-dev] clean up unused conversations
by Martin Kouba
Dne 26.11.2015 v 10:48 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> Hi Martin,
>
> Let me clarify with a scenario:
>
> If I set the conversation timeout to be 30s, the unused conversations is
> destroyed after the timeout, e.g. 31s, automatically. No user
> interactions are involved. No ServletRequestListener needs to be
> registered by the customer applications.
>
> In summary, the unused conversations will be cleared either during
> ServletRequestListner.requestDestroyed() notification or HTTPSession
> timeout. Do you have anyone complain about unused conversations not
> cleared up timely?
Yes, the timed out conversations are automatically destroyed after the
next ServletRequestListner.requestDestroyed() or when the session times
out or when the session is invalidated. No ServletRequestListener needs
to be registered by the application.
No complaints so far.
>
> Many thanks,
> Emily
> ===========================
> Emily Jiang
> WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
>
> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
>
> Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>
>
>
>
> From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> To: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
> Cc: weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Date: 26/11/2015 08:04
> Subject: Re: [weld-dev] clean up unused conversations
> Sent by: weld-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi Emily,
>
> there is no such way. Of course, if an HTTP session times out all the
> conversations are destroyed as well.
>
> Martin
>
> Dne 25.11.2015 v 15:40 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > Thank you Martin! Is there any way to destroy the unused conversations
> > earlier before ServletRequestListener.requestDestroyed()?
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > Emily
> > ===========================
> > Emily Jiang
> > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
> >
> > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
> >
> > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> > To: weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org,
> > Date: 18/11/2015 07:53
> > Subject: Re: [weld-dev] clean up unused conversations
> > Sent by: weld-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Emily,
> >
> > in Weld all expired/timed-out conversations are marked as transient and
> > destroyed during every ServletRequestListener.requestDestroyed()
> > notification. So there is no such configuration property.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > Dne 17.11.2015 v 23:15 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > > In OpenWebBeans, there is a configuration
> > > *org.apache.webbeans.conversation.Conversation.periodicDelay*
> > >
> > > Specifies a delay in milliseconds. Use the conversation periodic delay
> > > custom property to search for and delete unused conversations.
> > >
> > > Is there such configuration in Weld?
> > >
> > > Many thanks,
> > > Emily
> > > ===========================
> > > Emily Jiang
> > > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
> > >
> > > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
> > >
> > > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> > > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> > > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
> number
> > > 741598.
> > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
> > PO6 3AU
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > weld-dev mailing list
> > > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Kouba
> > Software Engineer
> > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> > _______________________________________________
> > weld-dev mailing list
> > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Martin Kouba
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Czech Republic
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>
>
--
Martin Kouba
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
10 years, 3 months
Re: [weld-dev] clean up unused conversations
by Martin Kouba
Hi Emily,
there is no such way. Of course, if an HTTP session times out all the
conversations are destroyed as well.
Martin
Dne 25.11.2015 v 15:40 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> Thank you Martin! Is there any way to destroy the unused conversations
> earlier before ServletRequestListener.requestDestroyed()?
>
> Many thanks,
> Emily
> ===========================
> Emily Jiang
> WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
>
> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
>
> Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>
>
>
>
> From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> To: weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org,
> Date: 18/11/2015 07:53
> Subject: Re: [weld-dev] clean up unused conversations
> Sent by: weld-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi Emily,
>
> in Weld all expired/timed-out conversations are marked as transient and
> destroyed during every ServletRequestListener.requestDestroyed()
> notification. So there is no such configuration property.
>
> Martin
>
> Dne 17.11.2015 v 23:15 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > In OpenWebBeans, there is a configuration
> > *org.apache.webbeans.conversation.Conversation.periodicDelay*
> >
> > Specifies a delay in milliseconds. Use the conversation periodic delay
> > custom property to search for and delete unused conversations.
> >
> > Is there such configuration in Weld?
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > Emily
> > ===========================
> > Emily Jiang
> > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
> >
> > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
> >
> > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> > 741598.
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
> PO6 3AU
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > weld-dev mailing list
> > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> >
>
> --
> Martin Kouba
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Czech Republic
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>
>
--
Martin Kouba
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
10 years, 3 months
clean up unused conversations
by Emily Jiang
In OpenWebBeans, there is a configuration
org.apache.webbeans.conversation.Conversation.periodicDelay
Specifies a delay in milliseconds. Use the conversation periodic delay
custom property to search for and delete unused conversations.
Is there such configuration in Weld?
Many thanks,
Emily
===========================
Emily Jiang
WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
10 years, 3 months
Re: [weld-dev] potential weld jira
by Martin Kouba
AlternativeCounterProducerModified is enabled in beans-xml-modified.jar
and specializes CounterProducerModified.
So I don't agree, raise a question pls.
Martin
Dne 19.11.2015 v 10:58 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> I found this in the spec:
>
>
> Hi Martin,
> I found this:
>
> In 4.3 Specialization,
> @Alternative @Specializes
> public class MockAsynchronousService extends AsynchronousService {
> ...
> }
> *When an enabled bean*, as defined in Section 5.1.2, “Enabled and
> disabled beans”, specializes
> a second bean, we can be certain that the second bean is never
> instantiated or called by the
> container.
>
> If the alternative bean is not enabled, it should not specialise/disable
> another bean. Do you agree with me or you still want me to raise a
> question in cdi-dev?
>
>
> Many thanks,
> Emily
> ===========================
> Emily Jiang
> WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
>
> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
>
> Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>
>
>
>
> From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> To: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
> Cc: Weld <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Date: 19/11/2015 09:11
> Subject: Re: [weld-dev] potential weld jira
> Sent by: weld-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Dne 19.11.2015 v 10:07 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > The issue is that the specialized bean is not enabled for
> > beans-xml-modified2.jar.
>
> Yep, but the spec does not state this should be taken into account.
>
> > @Alternative @Specialized annotated beans should not be active if it is
> > not enabled. I think the specialized should not be active if the
> > alternative is not. Otherwise, we run into the situation where the
> > specialized bean disabled a second bean but itself is not active.
> >
> > ok. I'll post the question on cdi-dev.
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > Emily
> > ===========================
> > Emily Jiang
> > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
> >
> > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
> >
> > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> > To: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
> > Cc: Weld <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> > Date: 19/11/2015 07:46
> > Subject: Re: [weld-dev] potential weld jira
> > Sent by: weld-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > The enablement is per bean archive but specialization is not, see also
> > 4.3. Specialization:
> >
> > "When an enabled bean, as defined in Enabled and disabled beans,
> > specializes a second bean, we can be certain that the second bean is
> > never instantiated or called by the container. Even if the second bean
> > defines a producer or observer method, the method will never be called."
> >
> > In other words, AlternativeCounterProducerModified (which is enabled in
> > beans-xml-modified.jar) specializes CounterProducerModified. And so
> > CounterProducerModified is not enabled for beans-xml-modified2.jar
> > because it is specialized by any other enabled bean.
> >
> > Feel free to post a question to the cdi-dev ML.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > Dne 18.11.2015 v 18:14 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > > Thank you Martin!
> > >
> > > I interpreted this enablement differently.
> > >
> > > The CDI 1.2 spec states:
> > >
> > > A bean is said to be /enabled/ if:
> > >
> > > * it is deployed in a bean archive, and
> > > * it is not a producer method or field of a disabled bean, and
> > > * it is not specialized by any other enabled bean, as defined in
> > > _Specialization_
> > > <http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#specialization>,
> > > and either
> > > * it is not an alternative, or it is a selected alternative of at
> > > least one bean archive or the application.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, the bean is said to be disabled.
> > >
> > > In the above app, there are two jars. The jar
> > > beans-xml-modified2.jar.jar does not enable the alternative and
> in its
> > > injection, it should only see the CounterProducerModified. While in
> > > another jar, the alternative AlternativeCounterProducerModified
> > > completely disabled the CounterProducerModified. Any injection in that
> > > jar should only see the specialized bean.
> > >
> > > From what you explained, the beans.xml in one jar enabled the
> > > alternative bean and affect other jars. From my understanding, the
> > > enablement of alternatives/interceptors are specific for that archive
> > > and should not affect other jars.
> > >
> > > Also OpenWebBeans behaves differently from Weld, and OpenWebBeans does
> > > what I have expected (enablement are per jar only).
> > >
> > > Many thanks,
> > > Emily
> > > ===========================
> > > Emily Jiang
> > > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
> > >
> > > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
> > >
> > > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> > > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> > > To: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
> > > Cc: Weld <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> > > Date: 18/11/2015 15:52
> > > Subject: Re: potential weld jira
> > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, it seems the problem is that CounterProducerModified is
> > > specialized by AlternativeCounterProducerModified and so it's not
> > > enabled and therefore it's producer method is also disabled (see also
> > > 5.1.2. Enabled and disabled beans [1]), i.e. it's not available for
> > > injection in beans-xml-modified2.jar. And
> > > AlternativeCounterProducerModified is an alternative which is not
> > > selected for beans-xml-modified2.jar.
> > >
> > > It should work if you enable AlternativeCounterProducerModified
> globally
> > > or select AlternativeCounterProducerModified for
> beans-xml-modified2.jar.
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#enablement
> > >
> > > Dne 18.11.2015 v 16:14 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > > > Hi Martin,
> > > >
> > > > Here's a simplified form of the test case:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The application does not start, reporting
> > > >
> > > > [ERROR ] CWWKZ0004E: An exception occurred while starting the
> > > > application testDiffBDA. The exception message was:
> > > > com.ibm.ws.container.service.state.StateChangeException:
> > > > org.jboss.weld.exceptions.DeploymentException: WELD-001408:
> > Unsatisfied
> > > > dependencies for type String with qualifiers
> @CounterModifiedQualifier
> > > > at injection point [BackedAnnotatedField] @Inject
> > > > @CounterModifiedQualifier
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified2.modifiedProducer
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified2.modifiedProducer(CounterProducerConsumerModified2.java:0)
> > > >
> > > > There are five classes in the .war.
> > > >
> > > > testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/classes/test/diff/web/FrontEndServlet.class
> > > >
> > > > @Inject CounterProducerConsumerModified2 bean;
> > > >
> > > > This class, CounterProducerConsumerModified2.class is packaged
> in the
> > > > first of two WEB-INF/lib jars, at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified2.jar.jar/com/ibm/jcdi/test/beans/xml.
> > > > There is a bean that needs another bean injected into it:
> > > >
> > > > @Inject@CounterModifiedQualifierString modifiedProducer;
> > > >
> > > > The remaining three classes are all in the second WEB-INF/lib
> jar, at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified.jar.jar/com/ibm/jcdi/test/beansxml/.
> > > > The classes are
> > > >
> > > > CounterModifiedQualifier (the interface)
> > > > CounterProducerModified (the bean implementing that interface)
> > > > AlternativeCounterProducerModified (an alternative bean)
> > > >
> > > > The AlternativeCounterProducerModified class is declared in
> > > >
> > >
> >
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified.jar.jar/META-INF/beans.xml,
> > > >
> > > > <alternatives>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> <class>com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.AlternativeCounterProducerModified</class>
> > > > </alternatives>
> > > >
> > > > The test app starts correctly if the <alternative> stanza is
> > > commented out.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Many thanks,
> > > > Emily
> > > > ===========================
> > > > Emily Jiang
> > > > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
> > > >
> > > > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > > > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
> > > >
> > > > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> > > > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> > > > To: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB, Weld <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>,
> > > > Date: 18/11/2015 07:58
> > > > Subject: Re: potential weld jira
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Emily,
> > > >
> > > > a brief description would be helpful - it's not a trivial
> > > > deployment/reproducer.
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > Dne 16.11.2015 v 23:15 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > > > > I'm trying to deploy the attached war but got Weld alidation
> > error. On
> > > > > Glassfish 4.1, I got this error:
> > > > > Error occurred during deployment: Exception while loading
> the app
> > > : CDI
> > > > > deployment failure:WELD-001408: Unsatisfied dependencies for
> type
> > > String
> > > > > with qualifiers @DiffBDACounterQualifier at injection point
> > > > > [BackedAnnotatedField] @Inject @DiffBDACounterQualifier
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified.diffBDAProducer
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified.diffBDAProducer(CounterProducerConsumerModified.java:0)
> > > > > WELD-001475: The following beans match by type, but none have
> > matching
> > > > > qualifiers: - Producer Method [String] with qualifiers
> > > > > [@CounterUnmodifiedQualifier @Any] declared as
> > > [[BackedAnnotatedMethod]
> > > > > @ExcludeClassInterceptors @Produces @CounterUnmodifiedQualifier
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerNoModifiers.getCounterBeanProducer()],
> > > > > - Producer Method [String] with qualifiers [@BatchProperty @Any]
> > > > > declared as [[UnbackedAnnotatedMethod] @Produces @Dependent
> > > > > @BatchProperty public
> > com.ibm.jbatch.container.cdi.BatchProducerBean.p
> > > > > .... msg.seeServerLog
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The app works fine on OpenWebBeans. Any ideas on what was wrong?
> > > > >
> > > > > Many thanks,
> > > > > Emily
> > > > > ===========================
> > > > > Emily Jiang
> > > > > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
> > > > >
> > > > > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > > > > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
> > > > >
> > > > > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> > > > > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Martin Kouba
> > > > Software Engineer
> > > > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martin Kouba
> > > Software Engineer
> > > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Kouba
> > Software Engineer
> > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> > _______________________________________________
> > weld-dev mailing list
> > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> >
> >
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> > 741598.
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
> PO6 3AU
> >
>
> --
> Martin Kouba
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Czech Republic
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
--
Martin Kouba
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
10 years, 4 months
Re: [weld-dev] potential weld jira
by Martin Kouba
Dne 19.11.2015 v 10:07 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> Hi Martin,
>
> The issue is that the specialized bean is not enabled for
> beans-xml-modified2.jar.
Yep, but the spec does not state this should be taken into account.
> @Alternative @Specialized annotated beans should not be active if it is
> not enabled. I think the specialized should not be active if the
> alternative is not. Otherwise, we run into the situation where the
> specialized bean disabled a second bean but itself is not active.
>
> ok. I'll post the question on cdi-dev.
>
> Many thanks,
> Emily
> ===========================
> Emily Jiang
> WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
>
> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
>
> Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>
>
>
>
> From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> To: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
> Cc: Weld <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Date: 19/11/2015 07:46
> Subject: Re: [weld-dev] potential weld jira
> Sent by: weld-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> The enablement is per bean archive but specialization is not, see also
> 4.3. Specialization:
>
> "When an enabled bean, as defined in Enabled and disabled beans,
> specializes a second bean, we can be certain that the second bean is
> never instantiated or called by the container. Even if the second bean
> defines a producer or observer method, the method will never be called."
>
> In other words, AlternativeCounterProducerModified (which is enabled in
> beans-xml-modified.jar) specializes CounterProducerModified. And so
> CounterProducerModified is not enabled for beans-xml-modified2.jar
> because it is specialized by any other enabled bean.
>
> Feel free to post a question to the cdi-dev ML.
>
> Martin
>
> Dne 18.11.2015 v 18:14 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > Thank you Martin!
> >
> > I interpreted this enablement differently.
> >
> > The CDI 1.2 spec states:
> >
> > A bean is said to be /enabled/ if:
> >
> > * it is deployed in a bean archive, and
> > * it is not a producer method or field of a disabled bean, and
> > * it is not specialized by any other enabled bean, as defined in
> > _Specialization_
> > <http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#specialization>,
> > and either
> > * it is not an alternative, or it is a selected alternative of at
> > least one bean archive or the application.
> >
> > Otherwise, the bean is said to be disabled.
> >
> > In the above app, there are two jars. The jar
> > beans-xml-modified2.jar.jar does not enable the alternative and in its
> > injection, it should only see the CounterProducerModified. While in
> > another jar, the alternative AlternativeCounterProducerModified
> > completely disabled the CounterProducerModified. Any injection in that
> > jar should only see the specialized bean.
> >
> > From what you explained, the beans.xml in one jar enabled the
> > alternative bean and affect other jars. From my understanding, the
> > enablement of alternatives/interceptors are specific for that archive
> > and should not affect other jars.
> >
> > Also OpenWebBeans behaves differently from Weld, and OpenWebBeans does
> > what I have expected (enablement are per jar only).
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > Emily
> > ===========================
> > Emily Jiang
> > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
> >
> > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
> >
> > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> > To: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
> > Cc: Weld <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> > Date: 18/11/2015 15:52
> > Subject: Re: potential weld jira
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, it seems the problem is that CounterProducerModified is
> > specialized by AlternativeCounterProducerModified and so it's not
> > enabled and therefore it's producer method is also disabled (see also
> > 5.1.2. Enabled and disabled beans [1]), i.e. it's not available for
> > injection in beans-xml-modified2.jar. And
> > AlternativeCounterProducerModified is an alternative which is not
> > selected for beans-xml-modified2.jar.
> >
> > It should work if you enable AlternativeCounterProducerModified globally
> > or select AlternativeCounterProducerModified for beans-xml-modified2.jar.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > [1]
> > http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#enablement
> >
> > Dne 18.11.2015 v 16:14 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > > Hi Martin,
> > >
> > > Here's a simplified form of the test case:
> > >
> > >
> > > The application does not start, reporting
> > >
> > > [ERROR ] CWWKZ0004E: An exception occurred while starting the
> > > application testDiffBDA. The exception message was:
> > > com.ibm.ws.container.service.state.StateChangeException:
> > > org.jboss.weld.exceptions.DeploymentException: WELD-001408:
> Unsatisfied
> > > dependencies for type String with qualifiers @CounterModifiedQualifier
> > > at injection point [BackedAnnotatedField] @Inject
> > > @CounterModifiedQualifier
> > >
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified2.modifiedProducer
> > > at
> > >
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified2.modifiedProducer(CounterProducerConsumerModified2.java:0)
> > >
> > > There are five classes in the .war.
> > >
> > > testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/classes/test/diff/web/FrontEndServlet.class
> > >
> > > @Inject CounterProducerConsumerModified2 bean;
> > >
> > > This class, CounterProducerConsumerModified2.class is packaged in the
> > > first of two WEB-INF/lib jars, at
> > >
> >
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified2.jar.jar/com/ibm/jcdi/test/beans/xml.
> > > There is a bean that needs another bean injected into it:
> > >
> > > @Inject@CounterModifiedQualifierString modifiedProducer;
> > >
> > > The remaining three classes are all in the second WEB-INF/lib jar, at
> > >
> >
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified.jar.jar/com/ibm/jcdi/test/beansxml/.
> > > The classes are
> > >
> > > CounterModifiedQualifier (the interface)
> > > CounterProducerModified (the bean implementing that interface)
> > > AlternativeCounterProducerModified (an alternative bean)
> > >
> > > The AlternativeCounterProducerModified class is declared in
> > >
> >
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified.jar.jar/META-INF/beans.xml,
> > >
> > > <alternatives>
> > >
> >
> <class>com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.AlternativeCounterProducerModified</class>
> > > </alternatives>
> > >
> > > The test app starts correctly if the <alternative> stanza is
> > commented out.
> > >
> > >
> > > Many thanks,
> > > Emily
> > > ===========================
> > > Emily Jiang
> > > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
> > >
> > > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
> > >
> > > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> > > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> > > To: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB, Weld <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>,
> > > Date: 18/11/2015 07:58
> > > Subject: Re: potential weld jira
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Emily,
> > >
> > > a brief description would be helpful - it's not a trivial
> > > deployment/reproducer.
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > Dne 16.11.2015 v 23:15 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > > > I'm trying to deploy the attached war but got Weld alidation
> error. On
> > > > Glassfish 4.1, I got this error:
> > > > Error occurred during deployment: Exception while loading the app
> > : CDI
> > > > deployment failure:WELD-001408: Unsatisfied dependencies for type
> > String
> > > > with qualifiers @DiffBDACounterQualifier at injection point
> > > > [BackedAnnotatedField] @Inject @DiffBDACounterQualifier
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified.diffBDAProducer
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified.diffBDAProducer(CounterProducerConsumerModified.java:0)
> > > > WELD-001475: The following beans match by type, but none have
> matching
> > > > qualifiers: - Producer Method [String] with qualifiers
> > > > [@CounterUnmodifiedQualifier @Any] declared as
> > [[BackedAnnotatedMethod]
> > > > @ExcludeClassInterceptors @Produces @CounterUnmodifiedQualifier
> > > >
> > >
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerNoModifiers.getCounterBeanProducer()],
> > > > - Producer Method [String] with qualifiers [@BatchProperty @Any]
> > > > declared as [[UnbackedAnnotatedMethod] @Produces @Dependent
> > > > @BatchProperty public
> com.ibm.jbatch.container.cdi.BatchProducerBean.p
> > > > .... msg.seeServerLog
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The app works fine on OpenWebBeans. Any ideas on what was wrong?
> > > >
> > > > Many thanks,
> > > > Emily
> > > > ===========================
> > > > Emily Jiang
> > > > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
> > > >
> > > > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > > > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
> > > >
> > > > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> > > > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martin Kouba
> > > Software Engineer
> > > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Kouba
> > Software Engineer
> > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Martin Kouba
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Czech Republic
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
--
Martin Kouba
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
10 years, 4 months
Re: [weld-dev] potential weld jira
by Martin Kouba
The enablement is per bean archive but specialization is not, see also
4.3. Specialization:
"When an enabled bean, as defined in Enabled and disabled beans,
specializes a second bean, we can be certain that the second bean is
never instantiated or called by the container. Even if the second bean
defines a producer or observer method, the method will never be called."
In other words, AlternativeCounterProducerModified (which is enabled in
beans-xml-modified.jar) specializes CounterProducerModified. And so
CounterProducerModified is not enabled for beans-xml-modified2.jar
because it is specialized by any other enabled bean.
Feel free to post a question to the cdi-dev ML.
Martin
Dne 18.11.2015 v 18:14 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> Thank you Martin!
>
> I interpreted this enablement differently.
>
> The CDI 1.2 spec states:
>
> A bean is said to be /enabled/ if:
>
> * it is deployed in a bean archive, and
> * it is not a producer method or field of a disabled bean, and
> * it is not specialized by any other enabled bean, as defined in
> _Specialization_
> <http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#specialization>,
> and either
> * it is not an alternative, or it is a selected alternative of at
> least one bean archive or the application.
>
> Otherwise, the bean is said to be disabled.
>
> In the above app, there are two jars. The jar
> beans-xml-modified2.jar.jar does not enable the alternative and in its
> injection, it should only see the CounterProducerModified. While in
> another jar, the alternative AlternativeCounterProducerModified
> completely disabled the CounterProducerModified. Any injection in that
> jar should only see the specialized bean.
>
> From what you explained, the beans.xml in one jar enabled the
> alternative bean and affect other jars. From my understanding, the
> enablement of alternatives/interceptors are specific for that archive
> and should not affect other jars.
>
> Also OpenWebBeans behaves differently from Weld, and OpenWebBeans does
> what I have expected (enablement are per jar only).
>
> Many thanks,
> Emily
> ===========================
> Emily Jiang
> WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
>
> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
>
> Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>
>
>
>
> From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> To: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
> Cc: Weld <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Date: 18/11/2015 15:52
> Subject: Re: potential weld jira
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Well, it seems the problem is that CounterProducerModified is
> specialized by AlternativeCounterProducerModified and so it's not
> enabled and therefore it's producer method is also disabled (see also
> 5.1.2. Enabled and disabled beans [1]), i.e. it's not available for
> injection in beans-xml-modified2.jar. And
> AlternativeCounterProducerModified is an alternative which is not
> selected for beans-xml-modified2.jar.
>
> It should work if you enable AlternativeCounterProducerModified globally
> or select AlternativeCounterProducerModified for beans-xml-modified2.jar.
>
> Martin
>
> [1]
> http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#enablement
>
> Dne 18.11.2015 v 16:14 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > Here's a simplified form of the test case:
> >
> >
> > The application does not start, reporting
> >
> > [ERROR ] CWWKZ0004E: An exception occurred while starting the
> > application testDiffBDA. The exception message was:
> > com.ibm.ws.container.service.state.StateChangeException:
> > org.jboss.weld.exceptions.DeploymentException: WELD-001408: Unsatisfied
> > dependencies for type String with qualifiers @CounterModifiedQualifier
> > at injection point [BackedAnnotatedField] @Inject
> > @CounterModifiedQualifier
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified2.modifiedProducer
> > at
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified2.modifiedProducer(CounterProducerConsumerModified2.java:0)
> >
> > There are five classes in the .war.
> >
> > testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/classes/test/diff/web/FrontEndServlet.class
> >
> > @Inject CounterProducerConsumerModified2 bean;
> >
> > This class, CounterProducerConsumerModified2.class is packaged in the
> > first of two WEB-INF/lib jars, at
> >
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified2.jar.jar/com/ibm/jcdi/test/beans/xml.
> > There is a bean that needs another bean injected into it:
> >
> > @Inject@CounterModifiedQualifierString modifiedProducer;
> >
> > The remaining three classes are all in the second WEB-INF/lib jar, at
> >
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified.jar.jar/com/ibm/jcdi/test/beansxml/.
> > The classes are
> >
> > CounterModifiedQualifier (the interface)
> > CounterProducerModified (the bean implementing that interface)
> > AlternativeCounterProducerModified (an alternative bean)
> >
> > The AlternativeCounterProducerModified class is declared in
> >
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified.jar.jar/META-INF/beans.xml,
> >
> > <alternatives>
> >
> <class>com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.AlternativeCounterProducerModified</class>
> > </alternatives>
> >
> > The test app starts correctly if the <alternative> stanza is
> commented out.
> >
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > Emily
> > ===========================
> > Emily Jiang
> > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
> >
> > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
> >
> > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> > To: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB, Weld <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>,
> > Date: 18/11/2015 07:58
> > Subject: Re: potential weld jira
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Emily,
> >
> > a brief description would be helpful - it's not a trivial
> > deployment/reproducer.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > Dne 16.11.2015 v 23:15 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > > I'm trying to deploy the attached war but got Weld alidation error. On
> > > Glassfish 4.1, I got this error:
> > > Error occurred during deployment: Exception while loading the app
> : CDI
> > > deployment failure:WELD-001408: Unsatisfied dependencies for type
> String
> > > with qualifiers @DiffBDACounterQualifier at injection point
> > > [BackedAnnotatedField] @Inject @DiffBDACounterQualifier
> > >
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified.diffBDAProducer
> > > at
> > >
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified.diffBDAProducer(CounterProducerConsumerModified.java:0)
> > > WELD-001475: The following beans match by type, but none have matching
> > > qualifiers: - Producer Method [String] with qualifiers
> > > [@CounterUnmodifiedQualifier @Any] declared as
> [[BackedAnnotatedMethod]
> > > @ExcludeClassInterceptors @Produces @CounterUnmodifiedQualifier
> > >
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerNoModifiers.getCounterBeanProducer()],
> > > - Producer Method [String] with qualifiers [@BatchProperty @Any]
> > > declared as [[UnbackedAnnotatedMethod] @Produces @Dependent
> > > @BatchProperty public com.ibm.jbatch.container.cdi.BatchProducerBean.p
> > > .... msg.seeServerLog
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The app works fine on OpenWebBeans. Any ideas on what was wrong?
> > >
> > > Many thanks,
> > > Emily
> > > ===========================
> > > Emily Jiang
> > > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
> > >
> > > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
> > >
> > > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> > > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Kouba
> > Software Engineer
> > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Martin Kouba
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Czech Republic
>
>
>
--
Martin Kouba
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
10 years, 4 months
Re: [weld-dev] potential weld jira
by Martin Kouba
Well, it seems the problem is that CounterProducerModified is
specialized by AlternativeCounterProducerModified and so it's not
enabled and therefore it's producer method is also disabled (see also
5.1.2. Enabled and disabled beans [1]), i.e. it's not available for
injection in beans-xml-modified2.jar. And
AlternativeCounterProducerModified is an alternative which is not
selected for beans-xml-modified2.jar.
It should work if you enable AlternativeCounterProducerModified globally
or select AlternativeCounterProducerModified for beans-xml-modified2.jar.
Martin
[1]
http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#enablement
Dne 18.11.2015 v 16:14 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> Hi Martin,
>
> Here's a simplified form of the test case:
>
>
> The application does not start, reporting
>
> [ERROR ] CWWKZ0004E: An exception occurred while starting the
> application testDiffBDA. The exception message was:
> com.ibm.ws.container.service.state.StateChangeException:
> org.jboss.weld.exceptions.DeploymentException: WELD-001408: Unsatisfied
> dependencies for type String with qualifiers @CounterModifiedQualifier
> at injection point [BackedAnnotatedField] @Inject
> @CounterModifiedQualifier
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified2.modifiedProducer
> at
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified2.modifiedProducer(CounterProducerConsumerModified2.java:0)
>
> There are five classes in the .war.
>
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/classes/test/diff/web/FrontEndServlet.class
>
> @Inject CounterProducerConsumerModified2 bean;
>
> This class, CounterProducerConsumerModified2.class is packaged in the
> first of two WEB-INF/lib jars, at
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified2.jar.jar/com/ibm/jcdi/test/beans/xml.
> There is a bean that needs another bean injected into it:
>
> @Inject@CounterModifiedQualifierString modifiedProducer;
>
> The remaining three classes are all in the second WEB-INF/lib jar, at
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified.jar.jar/com/ibm/jcdi/test/beansxml/.
> The classes are
>
> CounterModifiedQualifier (the interface)
> CounterProducerModified (the bean implementing that interface)
> AlternativeCounterProducerModified (an alternative bean)
>
> The AlternativeCounterProducerModified class is declared in
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified.jar.jar/META-INF/beans.xml,
>
> <alternatives>
> <class>com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.AlternativeCounterProducerModified</class>
> </alternatives>
>
> The test app starts correctly if the <alternative> stanza is commented out.
>
>
> Many thanks,
> Emily
> ===========================
> Emily Jiang
> WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
>
> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
>
> Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>
>
>
>
> From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> To: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB, Weld <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>,
> Date: 18/11/2015 07:58
> Subject: Re: potential weld jira
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi Emily,
>
> a brief description would be helpful - it's not a trivial
> deployment/reproducer.
>
> Martin
>
> Dne 16.11.2015 v 23:15 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > I'm trying to deploy the attached war but got Weld alidation error. On
> > Glassfish 4.1, I got this error:
> > Error occurred during deployment: Exception while loading the app : CDI
> > deployment failure:WELD-001408: Unsatisfied dependencies for type String
> > with qualifiers @DiffBDACounterQualifier at injection point
> > [BackedAnnotatedField] @Inject @DiffBDACounterQualifier
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified.diffBDAProducer
> > at
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified.diffBDAProducer(CounterProducerConsumerModified.java:0)
> > WELD-001475: The following beans match by type, but none have matching
> > qualifiers: - Producer Method [String] with qualifiers
> > [@CounterUnmodifiedQualifier @Any] declared as [[BackedAnnotatedMethod]
> > @ExcludeClassInterceptors @Produces @CounterUnmodifiedQualifier
> >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerNoModifiers.getCounterBeanProducer()],
> > - Producer Method [String] with qualifiers [@BatchProperty @Any]
> > declared as [[UnbackedAnnotatedMethod] @Produces @Dependent
> > @BatchProperty public com.ibm.jbatch.container.cdi.BatchProducerBean.p
> > .... msg.seeServerLog
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The app works fine on OpenWebBeans. Any ideas on what was wrong?
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > Emily
> > ===========================
> > Emily Jiang
> > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
> >
> > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
> >
> > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> >
>
> --
> Martin Kouba
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Czech Republic
>
>
>
--
Martin Kouba
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
10 years, 4 months
Re: [weld-dev] potential weld jira
by Martin Kouba
Hi Emily,
a brief description would be helpful - it's not a trivial
deployment/reproducer.
Martin
Dne 16.11.2015 v 23:15 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> I'm trying to deploy the attached war but got Weld alidation error. On
> Glassfish 4.1, I got this error:
> Error occurred during deployment: Exception while loading the app : CDI
> deployment failure:WELD-001408: Unsatisfied dependencies for type String
> with qualifiers @DiffBDACounterQualifier at injection point
> [BackedAnnotatedField] @Inject @DiffBDACounterQualifier
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified.diffBDAProducer
> at
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified.diffBDAProducer(CounterProducerConsumerModified.java:0)
> WELD-001475: The following beans match by type, but none have matching
> qualifiers: - Producer Method [String] with qualifiers
> [@CounterUnmodifiedQualifier @Any] declared as [[BackedAnnotatedMethod]
> @ExcludeClassInterceptors @Produces @CounterUnmodifiedQualifier
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerNoModifiers.getCounterBeanProducer()],
> - Producer Method [String] with qualifiers [@BatchProperty @Any]
> declared as [[UnbackedAnnotatedMethod] @Produces @Dependent
> @BatchProperty public com.ibm.jbatch.container.cdi.BatchProducerBean.p
> .... msg.seeServerLog
>
>
>
>
>
> The app works fine on OpenWebBeans. Any ideas on what was wrong?
>
> Many thanks,
> Emily
> ===========================
> Emily Jiang
> WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
>
> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
>
> Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>
--
Martin Kouba
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
10 years, 4 months
