Yeah, hence I mention that this could be added/done as well, as it's not.
Or is there a reason on why it's not?
On Jul 20, 2011, at 8:21 PM, Aslak Knutsen wrote:
That is what's being done:
https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-container-weld/pull/1/files
-aslak-
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Ales Justin <ales.justin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> public EntityManagerFactory resolvePersistenceUnit(InjectionPoint injectionPoint)
> {
> return null;
> }
>
> This method could probably be also implemented then, with same limitations.
>
> On Jul 18, 2011, at 5:30 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
>
>> It seems ok to me as long as we document any limitations carefully.
>>
>> On 18 Jul 2011, at 12:01, Aslak Knutsen wrote:
>>
>>> Heya
>>>
>>> Michal has a branch of the Arquillian Weld EE Mock Containers where he
>>> has implemented a v. of JPAInjectionService that can handle simple
>>> creation of PersistenceContext using
>>> Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory()
>>>
>>>
https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-container-weld/pull/1
>>>
>>> This could open up for some easy / lightweight cdi + jpa testing.
>>>
>>> Simply using @PersistenceContext in your CDI Beans.
>>>
>>> Is this useful as is, or is it to 'risky' without
>>> TransactionManagement support etc etc etc..
>>>
>>> wdyt?
>>>
>>> -aslak-
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> weld-dev mailing list
>>> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> weld-dev mailing list
>> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>