Re: [webbeans-dev] Typing of XML elements

Yes, that would be one way to implement it. Though I would properly do this under the ee namespace... On 20 Mar 2009, at 07:14, Nicklas Karlsson wrote: > Back to the issue at hand ;-) > > So. Is my understanding correct that we would have one hand-written > webbeans.xsd somewhere that defines that a beanType can have children > that are constructor parameters, methods and fields and they have > corresponding methodType, fieldType etc that describe them and then > the schema.xsd:s which are generated dynamically just describe the > structure of the classes and refer to wb:beanType, wb:fieldType, > wb:methodType etc? > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Jason T. Greene > <jason.greene(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> Jason T. Greene wrote: >>> >>> <xs:element name="bindingElement" type="bindingType"/> >>> >>> <xs:complexType name="classType"> >>> <xs:sequence> >>> <xs:element ref="bindingElement"/> >>> </xs:sequence> >>> </xs:complexType> >>> >>> // in the sales namespace >>> <xs:element name="Bar" substitutionGroup="webbeans:bindingElement"/> >>> >>> // in the acme namespace >>> <xs:element name="Foo" type="classType"/> >>> >>> >> >> You also want to make bindingElement abstract (abstract=true). >> >> -- >> Jason T. Greene >> JBoss, a division of Red Hat >> _______________________________________________ >> webbeans-dev mailing list >> webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev >> > > > > -- > --- > Nik -- Pete Muir http://www.seamframework.org http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete