Cool. So I will update the web beans docs so that people know how to
configure it. I'm also going to port this into the tomcat example (which I
hope to call servlet-numberguess). I'm also open to the prefix webapp- or
war- if you don't like servlet. I just need some way to give an indication
that it doesn't not build an EAR and does not depend on standard Java EE
features (like JTA or @PersistenceContext).
-Dan
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 20:03, Dan Allen wrote:
Aha! After some thinking, I realized that using a factory in Jetty is just
> a matter of some extra object construction. Instead of passing the
> ManagerObjectFactory directly, you simply pass a naming Reference that
> refers to the factory.
>
> <New id="jdciManager"
class="org.mortbay.jetty.plus.naming.Resource">
> <Arg><Ref id="webAppCtx"/></Arg>
> <Arg>jcdi/Manager</Arg>
> <Arg>
> <New class="javax.naming.Reference">
> <Arg>javax.inject.manager.Manager</Arg>
> <Arg>org.jboss.webbeans.resources.ManagerObjectFactory</Arg>
> <Arg/>
> </New>
> </Arg>
> </New>
>
This seems fine to me - I think adding another class is just more options.
>
> That works out of the box now. So the question becomes, should we add the
> class to simplify it to:
>
> <New id="jdci"
class="org.mortbay.jetty.plus.naming.Resource">
> <Arg><Ref id="webAppCtx"/></Arg>
> <Arg>jcdi/Manager</Arg>
> <Arg>
> <New
> class="org.jboss.webbeans.resources.ManagerObjectFactoryReference"/>
> </Arg>
> </New>
>
> ?
>
> I guess it can't hurt to add the class, but with proper documentation we
> can live without it. Pete, once you make the decision, I'll add it to the
> docs (and commit if you decide to have the extra class).
>
> Notice I went with the name ManagerObjectFactoryReference, which reads the
> best to me.
>
> -Dan
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Yeah, looks like Jetty doesn't support ObjectFactory natively. Probably it
> is actually neater to keep these two concepts separate, and just add an
> ManagerObjectFactoryReference class.
>
>
> On 23 Apr 2009, at 00:53, Dan Allen wrote:
>
> In the process of setting up the servlet-booking example for Seam, I
> tackled the problem of binding the JCDI Manager to JNDI on Jetty. It's just
> a matter of extending the javax.naming.Reference class. I attached the
> implementation to
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WBX-31.
>
> Should I commit this Pete? I need a decison on whether we should change
> the name of the class to reflect that it is an ObjectFactory and a
> Reference. I think internally Tomcat must create the reference automatically
> from the resource definition, which is why Jetty doesn't know what to do
> with a plain ObjectFactory.
>
> ...I also noticed that injection is not supported in Jetty. I'm not sure
> how to handle that problem, but it means no booking yet on Jetty.
>
> -Dan
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>
>
http://mojavelinux.com
>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
>
> NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
> basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
> from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a
> week,
> it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
> caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if
> you feel that it did not reach my attention.
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>
> --
> Pete Muir
>
http://www.seamframework.org
>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>
>
http://mojavelinux.com
>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
>
> NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
> basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
> from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a
> week,
> it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
> caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if
> you feel that it did not reach my attention.
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>
--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a week,
it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if
you feel that it did not reach my attention.