On 7 Dec 2009, at 15:55, Gavin King wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> "The decorator intercepts every method:
>
> • declared by a decorated type of the decorator
>
> • that is implemented by the bean class of the decorator."
>
> I think that needs an "and" or an "or" to make it clear which one
it means. I interpreted it as "or",
> but apparently it is "and" - I think is why there are some wrong bits in
the TCK (at least).
It is neither "and" nor "or". It is "that". Get rid of the
bullet
points, and read it as a single sentence.
"declared by a decorated type of the decorator that is implemented by the bean class
of the decorator" and "declared by a decorated type of the decorator and that is
implemented by the bean class of the decorator" has the same meaning (at least to my
ear). I would suggest removing the bullet points in the MR, I think that will make it much
clearer what is meant.