Re: [weld-dev] SQL framework proof of concept

OH come on. Can't you be more creative than that, it's the weekend after all? It's like being trapped in a jail cell, the JVM, and you'll never break free until you break the rules somehow. We need some kind of advantage over the other groups: http://deoxy.org/hs_cehn.htm what kind of an elevation is OOP or AOP really when you consider invisible dimensions? there's gotta be something else lurking invisibly somewhere... On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > OK, great. I've just decided to break the rules and say that up is > down. You should all be lying on the ceiling by now. > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Arbi Sookazian <asookazian(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > > don't you hate the rules? it was an interesting question... break the > > rules. > > > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > >> > >> Eh? By definition you can't do anything with the type system at > *runtime*! > >> > >> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls(a)gmail.com&gt; > >> wrote: > >> > Would it be doable to use e.g. Javassist to transform a class into > one > >> > of those static typesafe "entity classes" at runtime? > >> > > >> > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Arbi Sookazian < > asookazian(a)gmail.com&gt; > >> > wrote: > >> >> Looks like there are two tables (users and permissions) but > >> >> testQuery2() and > >> >> testQuery3() both select only from one table - users. So now we > need a > >> >> small db schema (i.e. data model). The typical customers and orders > >> >> would > >> >> suffice to demo FK and potential outer joins. How can I define > >> >> customerId > >> >> as a FK on orders table? Ideally, it would be nice to be able to do > >> >> all > >> >> this via tooling (i.e. exec a wizard that would generate the code > for > >> >> us). > >> >> But we need to be able to do all this via the API for now... > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> New rev, with ability to pass SQL as strings. > >> >>> > >> >>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > Latest, with a new approach to specifying types. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Gavin King > >> >>> gavin.king(a)gmail.com > >> >>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin > >> >>> http://hibernate.org > >> >>> http://seamframework.org > >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> weld-dev mailing list > >> >>> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> weld-dev mailing list > >> >> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > --- > >> > Nik > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Gavin King > >> gavin.king(a)gmail.com > >> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin > >> http://hibernate.org > >> http://seamframework.org > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> weld-dev mailing list > >> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > > > > > > > > -- > Gavin King > gavin.king(a)gmail.com > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin > http://hibernate.org > http://seamframework.org >