Re: [webbeans-dev] Request, Conversation and Session Scopes in Web Beans SE

Hi, > Looks good, though I think we shouldn't have session or request in > here (just conversation and application) I can certainly see the benefits of not having to worry about Request and Session scopes for standalone desktop apps. There were 2 main reasons I chose to include Request and Session though: - Primarily for applications other than standalone desktop apps which happen to have multiple user support and/or are server based, but no HTTP/Servlet based front-end. For example a Trading platform using FIX protocol. This almost makes me think that non Servlet scopes belong in a separate extension - something that could be used in conjunction with EJB Lite. Thinking aloud a bit there. - Secondarily, it made it easier to implement Conversation, which uses those two scopes in the existing implementation.

What are your thoughts on these? > Yes, I need to finish the lifeycle SPI stuff, I got the idea straight > now :-) > My idea is that lifecycle just has methods to do the relevant things > here, and you don't need to worry about things like conversation > manager... > > Let me do this work (will be the week after next I think), and then > we > can review? Sounds good! >> I would like to clean up the syntax for starting requests because >> it's >> obviously pretty ugly and verbose right now. Maybe some kind of >> annotation and interceptor pair perhaps? And possibly some >> Swing-specific helpers to make it easy to attach the Request context >> to >> a button click? Making this sort of stuff more transparent is my >> next >> goal. I guess, as hinted above, probably doing away with Request and Session scope, or somehow making it completely transparent at least is the way forward here. Agree?

Cheers, Pete. >> >> Let me know what you think, anyone. Cheers. >> >> >> Pete. >> >> >>>> >>>> >>>> Finally, I'm /experimenting/ with enabling and using Request, >>>> Session >>>> and Conversation scopes/contexts in SE. If you're interested in >>>> seeing >>>> the working code I've got the changes to core, SE and the number >>>> guess >>>> example ready to check in to separate branches. Happy to discuss >>>> this >>>> further if anyone is interested/curious. >>> >>> Perhaps send a patch out for review (or attach to a JIRA issue?) >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Pete. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> webbeans-dev mailing list >>>> webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev >>> >>> -- >>> Pete Muir >>> http://www.seamframework.org >>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete >>> >> <se-contexts.diff> > > -- > Pete Muir > http://www.seamframework.org > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete >