Re: [weld-dev] TCK Interceptors Classes

Gavin, This is very ambiguous, as the 1.1 version of the Interceptors specification states very clearly the signature rules for defining lifecycle interceptor methods on interceptor classes and target classes. Also, this could mean that an interceptor class can specify two different @PostConstruct or @PreDestroy methods, which would refer to different targets (the intercepted instance/the interceptor itself), but the specification says very clearly: "At most one method of a given interceptor class can be designated as an around-invoke method, an around-timeout method, a post-construct method, or pre-destroy method." Also, it is not very clear to me what would be the benefit of a separate @PostConstruct/@PreDestroy method for the interceptor itself, as interceptor lifecycles are virtually the same as for the target objects. Marius Gavin King wrote: Check section 5.2.5 of the EE spec. It appears to confirm my understanding of this stuff. On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: At least, that's my understanding of how interceptors are treated in EE6. You would have to check with Roberto and Ken for an absolutely definitive answer. On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Right, but the interceptor itself has a lifecycle. It's a kind of managed bean. So it can have the callbacks that all managed beans can have. On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu(a)yahoo.com&gt; wrote: There are two differents scenario for lifecycle callbacks in interceptors specification 1* Used in interceptor class with InvocationContext parameter      @PreDestroy      public void blabla(InvocationContext){} 2* Used in bean class without any parameter      @PreDestroy      public void blabla(){} In TCK, @PreDestroy is used in interceptor class. So it may take InvocationContext. --Gurkan ________________________________ From: Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; To: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu(a)yahoo.com&gt; Cc: weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Mon, November 30, 2009 9:10:17 PM Subject: Re: [weld-dev] TCK Interceptors Classes Hrm, I think there are two kinds of @PreDestroy methods for an interceptor: @PreDestroy void foo(InvocationContext) { .. }  -> the intercepted bean is being destroyed @PreDestroy void foo() { .. }  -> the interceptor itself is being destroyed Right? On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu(a)yahoo.com&gt; wrote: Hi; Some interceptors classes in the TCK test suites implement @PreDestroy methods. AFAIK, interceptors specification says that methods with @PreDestroy in interceptor class must take InvocationContext parameter. But in TCK, those methods do not take InvocationContext parameter For example: org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.dependent.TransactionalInterceptor @PreDestroy public void destroy()    {       destroyed = true;    } Is it correct? --Gurkan _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev -- Gavin King gavin.king(a)gmail.com http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin http://hibernate.org http://seamframework.org -- Gavin King gavin.king(a)gmail.com http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin http://hibernate.org http://seamframework.org -- Gavin King gavin.king(a)gmail.com http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin http://hibernate.org http://seamframework.org