Re: [webbeans-dev] @NormalScope and @Singleton

This sentence clearly needs fixing though 6.3, 20090812 - "All pseudo-scopes must be explicitly declared @NormalScope, to indicate to the container that no client proxy is required." On 20 Aug 2009, at 04:15, Gavin King wrote: > Actually @Singleton is a pseudo-scope, since it doesn't satisfy some > of the properties that 299 demands of normal scopes. > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Mark Struberg<struberg(a)yahoo.de> > wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I'm a bit confused about the description of the pseudo scopes in >> the latest spec (but it's really late here, so I might missed the >> point) >> >> a) ch 6.3: >>> Any scope that is not a normal scope is called a pseudo-scope. >> -> @Singleton [1] is per se only @Scope but not @NormalScope, >>> The concept of a current instance is not well-defined in the case >>> of a pseudo-scope. >> -> but instances of @Singleton are pretty well defined, isn't? >> >> Maybe we should introduce @Passivating and @PseudoScope instead of >> @NormalScope and invert the logic? >> >> b) ch 6.3 >>> All pseudo-scopes must be explicitly declared @NormalScope, >>> to indicate to the container that no client proxy is required. >> vs ch 5.5 >>> A contextual reference to a bean with a normal scope ... >>> ..not a direct reference... >>> Instead, the contextual reference is a client proxy object. >> >> I'd say pseudo scopes must _not_ declare @NormalScope? >> >> txs and LieGrue, >> strub >> >> [1] http://atinject.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/javadoc/javax/inject/Singleton.html >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webbeans-dev mailing list >> webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev >> > > > > -- > Gavin King > gavin.king(a)gmail.com > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin > http://hibernate.org > http://seamframework.org > > _______________________________________________ > webbeans-dev mailing list > webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev