On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:43 -0400, Dan Allen wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On 28 May 2009, at 16:04, Dan Allen wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Pete Muir
> <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Yeah, this is used a lot in the TCK, and maybe a bit
> in addons which enable injection in types WB doesn't
> know about (?), but I don't think users will hit it.
>
> Correct, users really should hit this. It's used heavily in
> tests, for instance in AbstractWebBeans tests.
Hmm, yes you might well want to use this in a standalone, unit
test, environment as an entry point.
It would be great if we can add a convenience method to
AbstractWebBeansTest. That would pretty much clear up any annoyances.
Yes, that is the plan. Ditto for the TCK abstract test class.
> It is also used when you are entering from outside the WB
> environment. You get a handle to manager and lookup the type
> that gives you entry. For instance, you might look up the
> Identity component and then invoke some method on it which
> may trigger a chain of WB injections once "inside".
Yes, this is addon frameworks, not end users.
Yep, agreed. I've found that injection is sufficient for all but those
"entry point" cases.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a
week,
it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message
if
you feel that it did not reach my attention.