Re: [weld-dev] Decorator question
But if (2) is allowed, then the restriction on the Interfaces is pretty restrictive. I
cannot see any additional benefit we gain from this restriction and we have to delegate
all not-overridden methods via a proxy anyway.
Can you please give me a hint why this is necessary?
txs and lieGrue,
strub
--- Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com> schrieb am Fr, 4.12.2009:
Von: Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com>
Betreff: Re: [weld-dev] Decorator question
An: "Marius Bogoevici" <mariusb(a)redhat.com>
CC: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de>, weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Datum: Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009, 1:56
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:44 PM,
Marius Bogoevici <mariusb(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> a) You can still have (2), if AnotherBeanClass
implements an interface
> AnInterface. It's just that the set of decorated
methods is restricted to
> the ones defined in the interface.
Actually, yes, that's true. I should have said that.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen
Massenmails.
http://mail.yahoo.com