Why can't we just append a short hash to the FQCN?
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:51 AM, David Allen <drallendc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Stuart,
We can probably easily identify cases through an initial pattern in the
name on deserialization, and then just stick to simply the class name as the
rest when that works and use the bean ID only in special cases where
needed. Sounds easy enough, but identifying the correct cases on
serialization might be more involved. I'll think about it some and might
have some time in June to do it, if you don't.
- David
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Stuart Douglas <
stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> It is something I have been planing to do something about for a while now,
> but never quite got around to it. The original reason is that we needed a
> deterministic way of determining proxy names that will be the same accross
> JVM's, and using the class name will not always work, so we used bean ID's.
> It should be possible to simplify this for most cases.
>
> Stuart
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:31, Jaikiran Pai <jpai(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am seeing many forum posts where, within the exception stacktrace, I
>>> see really long classnames for proxies generated by Weld.Here's one
>>> example
http://community.jboss.org/message/604723#604723. Out of
>>> curiosity, is there any reason why those names are so lengthy instead of
>>> just generating the classnames like java.lang.reflect.Proxy does?
>>>
>>
>> On top of the length annoyance, I think this is one of the reasons Weld
>> doesn't work on the IBM JDK (or I'm mistaken an it's a Solder issue).
But
>> from my brief testing, it had something to do with generated class names.
>> Just a heads up.
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>> --
>> Dan Allen
>> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>> Registered Linux User #231597
>>
>>
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
>>
http://mojavelinux.com
>>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> weld-dev mailing list
>> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev