Please make sure you file a CDI issue, ideally with some details about use cases and
suggested API.
On 3 Dec 2010, at 06:32, Dan Allen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Marius Bogoevici
<mariusb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I think it would be something nice to have. For example, Spring does this via
@Configurable, backed by AspectJ.
I've been asked about support for something akin to @Configurable after numerous
presentations I've given on CDI. I wasn't quite clear what @Configurable was all
about, but now I see. So yes, we could say that this has been a frequently requested
feature and would definitely be worth exploring.
...in fact, as I was walking today, I thought to myself "is the new keyword dead?
what was it like when we had to use it?". This brings everything back full circle so
that you can still create objects in the classic way, but benefit from modern programming
model patterns. Quite brilliant.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev