Re: [weld-dev] [cdi-dev] microbenchmark for CDI performance
I was under the impression that weld-dev just got renamed to cdi-dev.
I also got another issue while quickly starting up new threads:
88 [main] INFO org.jboss.weld.Bootstrap - WELD-000101 Transactional services not
available. Injection of @Inject UserTransaction not available. Transactional observers
will be invoked synchronously.
Exception in thread "Thread-3" java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.weld.ContextController.startRequestScope(ContextController.java:147)
at
org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.weld.WeldContextControl.startRequestScope(WeldContextControl.java:161)
at
org.apache.deltaspike.cdise.weld.WeldContextControl.startContext(WeldContextControl.java:70)
at at.struct.cdi.performance.CdiPerformanceTest$1.run(CdiPerformanceTest.java:56)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
is this a concurrency issue under high load? Or am I just doing something wrong?
LieGrue,
strub
On Tuesday, 21 October 2014, 12:49, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Mark,
Did you mean to send this to weld-dev instead of cdi-dev? (though I'm not sure if that
list is still maintained)
At first glance, these look odd:
persistence-api-1.0.2.jar
validation-api-1.0.0.GA.jar
jboss-ejb-api_3.1_spec-1.0.2.Final.jar
jboss-el-api_3.0_spec-1.0.0.Alpha1.jar
I don't recall them coming in when running SE.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de> wrote:
Hi!
>
>Weld folks, I need some help with a micro benchmark:
>
>You know we've talked about disk footprint in SE, so I hacked together a small
microbenchmark and as a side effect we also got what is really needed to have CDI running
>
>https://github.com/struberg/cdi-performance
>
>I'm curious about missing some dependency excludes for Weld.
>
>could you please run
>
>$> mvn clean dependency:copy-dependencies -DincludeScope=compile -PWeld
-Dweld.version=2.2.5.Final
>$> ls -al target/dependency/
>
>and tell me which dependencies can be without having some CDI functionality missing?
>
>Feel free to pimp the pom and ship a pull request.
>
>
>txs and LieGrue,
>strub
>_______________________________________________
>cdi-dev mailing list
>cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
>Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.
>