Re: [weld-dev] Question regarding behavior of Decorated dependent scoped beans

I have tried this in JBoss 6.0.0 M1 and it proxies interceptors/decorators even on dependent beans. --Gurkan From: Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; To: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org; Joseph Bergmark <bergmark(a)apache.org&gt; Sent: Fri, February 5, 2010 9:09:28 PM Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Question regarding behavior of Decorated dependent scoped beans On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Sorry, we lost this email. > > On 18 Jan 2010, at 23:07, Joseph Bergmark wrote: > >> While verifying the behavior of decorated dependent scoped beans on OpenWebBeans, Gurkan mentioned that he observed the same behavior on WELD. While verifying myself I noticed two behaviors that seem to conflict with the spec. >> >> 1) Non-normal scoped beans don't have any restrictions on public fields. A quick test showed that changes made to public fields directly are not reflected when a call to a getter method that returns that value of the public field is made. Presumably this is because there is an proxy like object in the middle. >> >> For example >> >> @Inject MyBean myBean; >> >> myBean.number = 7; >> myBean.getNumber(); //would return the default value for number and not 7 which it was just set to. > > Correct, I don't think the spec covers this. Interceptors and decorators are supposed to be implemented by subclassing, not by proxying. -- Gavin King gavin.king(a)gmail.com http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin http://hibernate.org http://seamframework.org _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! Haber, Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo! Türkiye'de! www.yahoo.com.tr