On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 05:42, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Pete Muir
<pmuir(a)bleepbleep.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On 21 Nov 2009, at 14:15, Steven Boscarine wrote:
>
> > Works for me, personally.
> >
> > As an outsider, it's obviously more friendly for non-JBoss employees
> > like me to contribute. I am still waiting on someone to tag those Weld
> > Maven archetypes I submitted so I can commit to trunk for review without
> > worrying about breaking anything. With git, that wouldn't be an issue.
>
> You are welcome to tag whenever you want :-)
>
> But I agree, GIT supports distributed development much better.
+1
I think this is amongst the most compelling reasons, perhaps even the most
compelling. It was so simple for me to get involved with the
maven-cli-plugin because it was hosted with git, and I want that same
experience for developers getting involved with Seam and Weld.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
+1
Moving to Git is a great idea.
--
Jason Porter
Real Programmers think better when playing Adventure or Rogue.
PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP fingerprint: 64C2 C078 13A9 5B23 7738 F7E5 1046 C39B 926C CFF5
PGP key available at:
keyserver.net,
pgp.mit.edu