[weld-dev] Fwd: @AroundInvoke -- JCDI vs EJB3 and return type Object?
Is this a minor bug in the spec? If this s the case, please also review the
example in 9.5.1.
br, Sven
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sven Linstaedt <sven.linstaedt(a)googlemail.com>
Date: 2009/10/23
Subject: Re: @AroundInvoke -- JCDI vs EJB3 and return type Object?
To: openwebbeans-dev(a)incubator.apache.org
At a first glance I would consider this a bug in the example. I can not
imagine Gavin introduced some kind of "special interceptors for void
returning methods". This would rather be a use case for decorators.
I will forward your question to the jboss list, if you don't mind.
Besides... thanks for for the review.
br, Sven
2009/10/22 Eric Covener <covener(a)apache.org>
Interceptor methods with @AroundInvoke in EJB3 requires a return type
of Object, which is enforced by
WebBeansUtil.java::checkAroundInvokeAnnotationCriterias(). In EJB3,
Interceptors return InvocationContext.proceed() to their caller.
However it seems that @AroundInvoke in JCDI is documented somewhat
differently -- in the JCDI spec (1.3.6) the example has a void return
type and just calls InvocationContext.proceed().
Should the JCDI spec example look just like EJB3, or is this an
OWB-specific restriction?
--
Eric Covener
covener(a)gmail.com
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.0 KB)