Re: [weld-dev] Decorator question
Gavin,
my main concern is to pass the TCK.
Beside that, I really don't like to propose new use cases (even if there is one: with
@Alternative, you'd need to subclass every class down the type hierarchy yourself,
with @Decorator 'extends', you'd be able to decorate the baseclass and that
would be applied to all subclasses automagically).
Maybe the TCK folks can look at the CatDecorator, and add a bit more Decorator tests, so
we have a set of facts we can both rely on? txs!
LieGrue,
strub
--- Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com> schrieb am Fr, 4.12.2009:
Von: Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com>
Betreff: Re: [weld-dev] Decorator question
An: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de>
CC: "Marius Bogoevici" <mariusb(a)redhat.com>, weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Datum: Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009, 17:51
Look, I just don't see the usecase
for what you're proposing.
If you're trying to extend a concrete class, override some
of its
methods, and delegate some methods back to the superclass,
just make
your subclass an @Alternative and call super.
I simply don't see the usecase for having a whole stack of
these
things. I don't think anyone needs this.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de>
wrote:
> But if (2) is allowed, then the restriction on the
Interfaces is pretty restrictive. I cannot see any
additional benefit we gain from this restriction and we have
to delegate all not-overridden methods via a proxy anyway.
> Can you please give me a hint why this is necessary?
>
> txs and lieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> --- Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com>
schrieb am Fr, 4.12.2009:
>
>> Von: Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com>
>> Betreff: Re: [weld-dev] Decorator question
>> An: "Marius Bogoevici" <mariusb(a)redhat.com>
>> CC: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de>,
weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Datum: Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009, 1:56
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:44 PM,
>> Marius Bogoevici <mariusb(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > a) You can still have (2), if
AnotherBeanClass
>> implements an interface
>> > AnInterface. It's just that the set of
decorated
>> methods is restricted to
>> > the ones defined in the interface.
>>
>> Actually, yes, that's true. I should have said
that.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen
herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen
Massenmails.
http://mail.yahoo.com