On 14 Jan 2009, at 09:37, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> I know the reason you want them out of the spec is to avoid having
>> to define
>> when each exception is thrown,
>>
> No, the real reason is that there is a corner case when processing
> the
> XML format where we're not sure if its a method or a field that is
> missing ;-)
>
okey - then I just hope the reference implementation will get good
exception handling for the rest ;)
Yup, still on the list to do. The plan is to go through at the CR
stage and standardize the format of all exception messages (just for
you Max) as by then we will know all the kinds of info that needs to
go into them.