Re: [weld-dev] [seam-dev] Mercurial vs GIT

Some time ago, I had to decide between git and hg for my personal projects. I opted to go with hg because I felt the docs were better (http://hgbook.red-bean.com/, for example) and the Windows support for hg was much better at the time (luckily, that's no longer an issue for me, as I'm not using Windows ATM :). For what it's worth, some people at my local JUG use git and have complained about the inconsistency between one command and another. I can neither confirm nor deny, as I've never used git in anger. I am, though, quite happy with Mercurial. Also, for what it's worth, it's my understanding that GlassFish (in addition to NetBeans, OpenJDK, etc) will be moving to hg at some point, so there are major projects on both systems. With regard to hosting, I'm using kenai.com for Mojarra Scales and FacesTester, and I've been really happy with it. I get a nice wiki, hg (or git or svn or cvs), and JIRA. I realize there may be concerns with kenai of various sorts, so, if that's not an option, bitbucket.org is one option for hosting projects. The Mercurial maintains a fairly lengthy list here: http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MercurialHosting On Nov 24, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Dan Allen wrote: > We all agreed to use git over svn, but to be honest, mercurial wasn't considered. I've used both as well. But in my short exposure, I really didn't see a difference. What makes git so attractive is that github.com explains so well how to use it. > > I supposed we could consider mercurcial if there was a nice out of the box hosting option like github.com. If not, git will likely win because of that. > > -Dan > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > I have seen a reasonable amount of GIT, and have liked what I saw, as have most of the other core team who have spoken up on this issue. > > Sell us Mercurial :-) > > On 24 Nov 2009, at 14:22, Francisco Jose Peredo wrote: > > > An interesting comparision?: > > > > http://importantshock.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/git-vs-mercurial/ > > > > > > Francisco Jose Peredo escribió: > >> I have not tried GIT, but from what I have read it is pretty > >> complicated to learn to use... > >> OTOH I have tried Mercurial, which is also distributed, and found it > >> confortable... apparently the > >> way it deals with its distribute nature is easier for subversion users > >> to understand... > >> AFAIK Netbeans source code is in Mercurial, also OpenJDK... So it > >> seems to work > >> well with large code bases... and there are plugins for Netbeans, > >> Eclipse and the Tortoise Hg > >> project is advanced and usable... > >> Google Code offers free Mercurial hosting... > >> Why not Mercurial? > >> > >> > >> > >> Pete Muir escribió: > >>> A quick item we discussed at the f2f meeting was whether to switch to > >>> GIT for our SCM, rather than SVN. > >>> > >>> This would give us a IMO a system well suited to our distribued dev > >>> model, it would also make it much easier for others to sandbox PEs and > >>> then contribute them back to us. > >>> > >>> The proposal is to use Github to host. > >>> > >>> The team members at devoxx were in favour, but what do others think? > >>> > >>> Pete > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Pete Muir > >>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> seam-dev mailing list > >>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Dirección Informática de Servicios Financieros > > Dirección General de Modernización e Innovación Gubernamental > > Secretaría de Administración y Finanzas > > Paseo de la Sierra 435 col. Reforma > > C.P. 86086, Villahermosa, Tabasco. > > Tel. 52 + 993 + 310 40 00 Ext. 7127 > > http://saf.tabasco.gob.mx/ > > > > IMPORTANTE: Esta transmisión electrónica, incluyendo sus anexos, archivos insertados o "attachments", puede constituir información confidencial o reservada, en los términos de la Ley de Acceso a la Información Pública del Estado de Tabasco, y estar protegida por el derecho fundamental a la privacidad. Se prohibe el uso de esta información por cualquier persona distinta al receptor intencional o previsto. Si usted ha recibibido esta transmisión electrónica por error, por favor responda inmediatamente al emisor y borre esta información de su sistema. El uso, diseminación, distribución o reproducción de esta transmisión electrónica por receptores no intencionados o no previstos por el emisor, no está autorizada y puede considerarse ilícita en los términos de la legislación penal y civil vigente. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > seam-dev mailing list > > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > > > > -- > Dan Allen > Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action > Registered Linux User #231597 > > http://mojavelinux.com > http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction > http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev Jason Lee, SCJP President, Oklahoma City Java Users Group Senior Java Developer, Sun Microsystems http://blogs.steeplesoft.com _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev